Journal cover Journal topic
Weather and Climate Dynamics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
WCD | Articles | Volume 1, issue 1
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 127–153, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-127-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 127–153, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-127-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 09 Apr 2020

Research article | 09 Apr 2020

Potential vorticity structure of embedded convection in a warm conveyor belt and its relevance for large-scale dynamics

Potential vorticity structure of embedded convection in a warm conveyor belt and its relevance for large-scale dynamics
Annika Oertel, Maxi Boettcher, Hanna Joos, Michael Sprenger, and Heini Wernli Annika Oertel et al.
  • Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland

Correspondence: Annika Oertel (annika.oertel@env.ethz.ch)

Abstract
Back to toptop

Warm conveyor belts (WCBs) are important airstreams in extratropical cyclones. They can influence large-scale flow evolution by modifying the potential vorticity (PV) distribution during their cross-isentropic ascent. Although WCBs are typically described as slantwise-ascending and stratiform-cloud-producing airstreams, recent studies identified convective activity embedded within the large-scale WCB cloud band. However, the impacts of this WCB-embedded convection have not been investigated in detail. In this study, we systematically analyze the influence of embedded convection in an eastern North Atlantic WCB on the cloud and precipitation structure, on the PV distribution, and on larger-scale flow. For this reason, we apply online trajectories in a high-resolution convection-permitting simulation and perform a composite analysis to compare quasi-vertically ascending convective WCB trajectories with typical slantwise-ascending WCB trajectories. We find that the convective WCB ascent leads to substantially stronger surface precipitation and the formation of graupel in the middle to upper troposphere, which is absent for the slantwise WCB category, indicating the key role of WCB-embedded convection for precipitation extremes. Compared to the slantwise WCB trajectories, the initial equivalent potential temperature of the convective WCB trajectories is higher, and the convective WCB trajectories originate from a region of larger potential instability, which gives rise to more intense cloud diabatic heating and stronger cross-isentropic ascent. Moreover, the signature of embedded convection is distinctly imprinted in the PV structure. The diabatically generated low-level positive PV anomalies, associated with a cyclonic circulation anomaly, are substantially stronger for the convective WCB trajectories. The slantwise WCB trajectories lead to the formation of a widespread region of low-PV air (that still have weakly positive PV values) in the upper troposphere, in agreement with previous studies. In contrast, the convective WCB trajectories form mesoscale horizontal PV dipoles at upper levels, with one pole reaching negative PV values. On a larger scale, these individual mesoscale PV anomalies can aggregate to elongated PV dipole bands extending from the convective updraft region, which are associated with coherent larger-scale circulation anomalies. An illustrative example of such a convectively generated PV dipole band shows that within around 10 h the negative PV pole is advected closer to the upper-level waveguide, where it strengthens the isentropic PV gradient and contributes to the formation of a jet streak. This suggests that the mesoscale PV anomalies produced by embedded convection upstream organize and persist for several hours and therefore can influence the synoptic-scale circulation. They thus can be dynamically relevant, influence the jet stream and (potentially) the downstream flow evolution, which are highly relevant aspects for medium-range weather forecast. Finally, our results imply that a distinction between slantwise and convective WCB trajectories is meaningful because the convective WCB trajectories are characterized by distinct properties.

1 Introduction
Back to toptop

1.1 Warm conveyor belts and embedded convection

Moist diabatic processes are known to play an important role in the evolution of extratropical cyclones and are frequently associated with rapid cyclogenesis (e.g., Anthes et al.1983; Kuo et al.1991; Stoelinga1996; Wernli et al.2002) and increased forecast error growth (e.g., Davies and Didone2013; Selz and Craig2015). Diabatic processes are particularly important in warm conveyor belts (WCBs), which are coherent, typically poleward-ascending airstreams associated with extratropical cyclones (Harrold1973; Browning1986, 1999; Wernli and Davies1997). During their typically slantwise cross-isentropic ascent from the boundary layer ahead of the cold front to the upper troposphere, they form large-scale, mostly stratiform cloud bands and play a key role in the distribution of surface precipitation (e.g., Browning1986; Eckhardt et al.2004; Madonna et al.2014; Pfahl et al.2014; Flaounas et al.2018).

Although WCBs are typically described as gradually ascending and mainly stratiform-cloud-producing airstreams (e.g., Browning1986; Madonna et al.2014), the concept of rapid convective motion embedded in the frontal cloud band of the WCB had already been proposed in 1993 (Neiman et al.1993). Recent studies have suggested that the WCB is, at least in some cases, not a homogeneously ascending airstream: in contrast, the detailed ascent behavior of the individual WCB trajectories associated with one extratropical cyclone can vary substantially (e.g., Martínez-Alvarado et al.2014; Rasp et al.2016; Oertel et al.2019), and convective activity can be frequently embedded in the large-scale baroclinic region of the WCB. This has been identified, e.g., with various remote-sensing data (Binder2016; Crespo and Posselt2016; Flaounas et al.2016, 2018), with online trajectories in convection-permitting simulations (Rasp et al.2016; Oertel et al.2019), and in coarser simulations with parameterized convection (Agustì-Panareda et al.2005; Martínez-Alvarado and Plant2014).

The strong cloud diabatic processes in both WCBs and convective systems modify the potential vorticity (PV) distribution in the lower and upper troposphere and thereby can affect the larger-scale dynamics (e.g., Pomroy and Thorpe2000; Grams et al.2011; Clarke et al.2019). Hence, WCBs can be associated with increased forecast uncertainty (Berman and Torn2019) and forecast errors (e.g., Martínez-Alvarado et al.2016a). Similarly, convective systems can introduce forecast errors (Clarke et al.2019) and also enhance the forecast uncertainty (Baumgart et al.2019). Occasionally, convection and WCBs can be individually related to forecast busts (Rodwell et al.2013; Grams et al.2018). The specific PV signatures of (i) large-scale WCB ascent and (ii) smaller-scale convective updrafts and their potential implications for the flow evolution differ substantially and are discussed in the following.

1.2 PV modification by WCBs and convection

PV is materially conserved along the flow only in the absence of friction and diabatic processes (Hoskins et al.1985). Neglecting frictional processes, the Lagrangian rate of change DDtPV can be expressed as

(1)DDtPV=1ρωθ˙,

where PV is defined as (Ertel1942)

(2)PV=1ρωθ,

and ρ is density, θ is potential temperature, θ˙ represents diabatic heating or cooling, and ω  is 3-D absolute vorticity (ω=×u+2Ω=ξi+ηj+(f+ζ)k, where u is the 3-D wind vector, Ω is the vector of earth rotation, ξ and η are the horizontal vorticity components in the x and y directions, f is the Coriolis parameter, and f+ζ is the absolute vertical vorticity).

For large-scale and predominantly slantwise WCB ascent, it is frequently assumed that the first-order effect of latent heating on PV is dominated by the vertical gradient of diabatic heating (e.g., Wernli and Davies1997; Joos and Wernli2012; Madonna et al.2014) resulting in PV generation below and PV destruction above the diabatic heating maximum according to Eq. (3):

(3)DDtPV1ρ(f+ζ)θ˙z.

These diabatically produced low-level positive and upper-level negative PV anomalies can lead to cyclone intensification (Rossa et al.2000; Binder et al.2016) and modify the upper-level flow evolution (e.g., Pomroy and Thorpe2000; Grams et al.2011; Schäfler and Harnisch2015; Joos and Forbes2016; Martínez-Alvarado et al.2016b).

PV is frequently considered for synoptic-scale dynamics (e.g., Hoskins et al.1985; Stoelinga1996) but is also suited for the analysis of mesoscale convective systems (e.g., Conzemius and Montgomery2009; Shutts2017; Clarke et al.2019) and has already been applied at the scale of individual convective cells (Chagnon and Gray2009; Weijenborg et al.2015, 2017). While for PV modification in synoptic-scale systems the horizontal gradient of diabatic heating is frequently neglected (as in Eq. 3), this assumption breaks down in the case of intense local diabatic heating, such as embedded mesoscale convective updrafts on the scale of a few kilometers. On the mesoscale, the horizontal gradients of θ˙ become relevant and Eq. (3) generalizes to the full form (Eq. 2), written here as

(4)DDtPV=1ρ(f+ζ)θ˙z+ωhhθ˙,

where ωh denotes the horizontal vorticity (ωh=ξi+ηj). Previous studies showed that the horizontal diabatic heating gradients play a major role in the PV modification in isolated convective updrafts (e.g., Chagnon and Gray2009; Weijenborg et al.2015, 2017) and in narrow smaller-scale heating regions embedded in a larger-scale flow (Harvey et al.2020). The localized diabatic heating in a vertically sheared environment generates upper-level horizontal PV dipoles centered around the convective updraft (Fig. 1) and aligned with the horizontal vorticity vector ωh (Eq. 4, Fig. 1, green arrow), which is rotated 90 anticlockwise to the vertical wind shear vector vz (Fig. 1, black arrow). Thereby, the positive PV pole (red shading in Fig. 1) occurs to the right of the vertical wind shear vector vz, since there hθ˙ (Fig. 1, grey arrows) is parallel to ωh, and the negative pole (blue shading in Fig. 1) occurs to the left of vz, where hθ˙ and ωh are antiparallel. The strongest PV production and destruction (Fig. 1, dark red and dark blue shading, respectively) arise where the horizontal vorticity vector (Fig. 1, green arrow) and the horizontal diabatic heating gradient, which points radially towards the center of the convective updraft (Fig. 1, grey arrows), are quasi-aligned, i.e., where the angle α between both vectors is small, as DDtPV|ωh||hθ˙|cosα. The PV production and destruction is attenuated where the angle α between ωh and hθ˙ increases (Fig. 1, orange and light blue shading, respectively). Thus, for smaller-scale diabatic heating, as in convective updrafts, the horizontal components of PV become increasingly dominant and generate an upper-level horizontal PV dipole, whereby one pole can reach negative PV values (Harvey et al.2020).

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f01

Figure 1Conceptual model of upper-level PV modification by a convective updraft (+) that is located in an environment with background horizontal vorticity. Variables are shown as follows: vertical wind shear vector (vz, black) with the cold air on the left, the horizontal vorticity vector (ωh, green), the diabatic heating gradients pointing radially toward the convective updraft (hθ˙, grey), and the regions where PV is destroyed (blue shading) and where PV is generated (red shading) because hθ˙-ωh and hθ˙ωh, respectively (see Eq. 4 and Schemm2013). The intensity of the blue and red shading schematically represent the degree of PV change. See text for details. Note that the orientation of the vertical wind shear vector and the PV dipole schematically represents the synoptic situation shown in Fig. 7c.

Download

This quasi-horizontal PV dipole structure is a robust response of convective updrafts in the presence of vertical wind shear (Chagnon and Gray2009; Weijenborg et al.2015, 2017; Hitchman and Rowe2017). Such convectively generated PV dipoles were previously identified in idealized simulations of isolated cumulus-scale convection (Chagnon and Gray2009), in case studies of mesoscale convective systems (Davis and Weisman1994; Chagnon and Gray2009; Hitchman and Rowe2017; Clarke et al.2019), and in midlatitude convective updrafts with varying large-scale flow conditions (Weijenborg et al.2015, 2017). The amplitude of the horizontal PV dipoles can strongly exceed the typical amplitude of synoptic-scale PV. In strong convective updrafts horizontal PV dipoles of ±10 PVU can be generated (Chagnon and Gray2009; Weijenborg et al.2015, 2017), resulting in regions of absolute negative PV. These regions can be hydrostatically, inertially, or symmetrically unstable (e.g., Hoskins2015) and can form mesoscale circulations associated with, e.g., frontal rainbands (Bennetts and Hoskins1979; Schultz and Schumacher1999; Siedersleben and Gohm2016), sting jets (Clark et al.2005; Volonté et al.2018, 2019), enhanced stratosphere–troposphere exchange (Rowe and Hitchman2015), and local jet accelerations and northward displacements (Rowe and Hitchman2016). The adjustment timescales for the release of these instabilities range from minutes for hydrostatic instability to several hours for inertial instability (timescale is proportional to [-f(f+ζ)]-0.5) (Schultz and Schumacher1999; Thompson et al.2018). Thus, while hydrostatic instability is rapidly released and near-neutral conditions are established, inertial instability can prevail for several hours and therefore synoptic-scale regions of inertial instability can be found, for instance at the anticyclonic shear side of midlatitude ridges (Thompson et al.2018).

Previous studies analyzed the PV modification by individual convective updrafts and mesoscale convective systems. However, the PV modification by aggregated convection embedded in the WCB ascent region, which is already subject to strong diabatic PV modification from large-scale WCB ascent, has not yet been investigated. Hence, the contribution of embedded convection in WCBs to the distribution of PV and the formation of mesoscale PV anomalies, which may influence the development of extratropical cyclones, is still unknown. Moreover, the persistence and dynamical relevance of the convectively generated PV dipoles has not yet been analyzed. Weijenborg et al. (2017) hypothesized that the convectively formed large-amplitude PV anomalies could be longer-lived than the relatively short-lived convective updrafts and suggested that a more detailed investigation of these PV anomalies might shed light on the dynamical relevance of convection. Related to this is the question whether the convectively generated PV dipoles aggregate to larger-scale PV anomalies and, if so, whether they feedback onto the synoptic-scale flow (Chagnon and Gray2009).

1.3 Aim and outline

In this study, we investigate convection embedded in a WCB case study and systematically analyze the PV modification of this convective activity. Furthermore, we go beyond the identification of convectively produced PV anomalies and evaluate the effect of these mesoscale PV anomalies on the larger-scale flow, thereby emphasizing the dynamical relevance of embedded convection. Therefore, online trajectories in a high-resolution convection-permitting simulation are computed to compare convective and slantwise WCB trajectories and their impact on the cloud and precipitation structure, as well as on the mesoscale and larger-scale dynamics. Together, this study shows how WCB-embedded convection, on the one hand, influences the local mesoscale dynamics and, on the other hand, can modify the larger-scale flow evolution – both relevant aspects for predictability. Moreover, this study provides a refined perspective on the relevance of smaller-scale processes for the larger-scale WCB dynamics. Specifically, we address the following questions.

  1. What is the impact of convective WCB ascent on cloud and precipitation structure (Sect. 3.2)?

  2. What are characteristic thermodynamic properties of convective and slantwise WCB ascent (Sect. 3.3)?

  3. Where do convective and slantwise WCB trajectories originate from (Sect. 3.4)?

  4. How does convective (vs. slantwise) WCB ascent modify the PV distribution along the ascent and in its environment (Sect. 3.5)?

  5. What is the impact of convectively modified PV on the local wind speed and circulation in the upper troposphere (Sect. 3.6)?

  6. How does convection embedded in WCBs and its associated PV anomalies influence the larger-scale dynamics (Sect. 4)?

This study is structured in the following way: Sect. 2 explains the methodology and briefly introduces the analyzed WCB case study. Thereafter, we systematically consider the mesoscale effects of convection embedded in WCBs (questions 1–5 above) in a composite analysis (Sect. 3). To address the question of the dynamical relevance of WCB-embedded convection (question 6), we consider an illustrative example of the characteristics and impact of WCB-embedded convection (Sect. 4.1) and evaluate the influence of the convectively generated PV anomalies on the large-scale flow (Sect. 4.2). Finally, we provide a discussion and outlook (Sect. 5) and conclusions (Sect. 6).

2 Data and approach
Back to toptop

2.1 COSMO setup and trajectories

The WCB case study was simulated with the limited-area nonhydrostatic model COSMO (Consortium for Small-scale Modeling; Baldauf et al.2011; Doms and Baldauf2018) at 0.02 (≈2.2 km) horizontal grid spacing with 60 vertical levels. The setup of the COSMO simulation and the online trajectories was the same as in Oertel et al. (2019). The simulation was initialized at 00:00 UTC, 22 September 2016, in the early phase of the cyclogenesis of Cyclone Vladiana (see Sect. 2.2) and ran for 112 h (see Oertel et al.2019). Initial and lateral boundary conditions are taken from the ECMWF analyses with a horizontal resolution of 0.1 every 6 h. The domain is centered in the eastern North Atlantic and extends from about 50 W to 20 E and 30 to 70 N. We apply the standard COSMO setup of the Swiss National Weather Service, which employs a one-moment six-category cloud microphysics scheme including prognostic water vapor (qv), liquid (LWC) and ice (IWC) cloud water content, rain (LWC), snow (SWC), and graupel (GWC). The graupel category is important for the explicit simulation of deep convection (Baldauf et al.2011). Deep convection is resolved at 2.2 km (e.g., Ban et al.2014), while for shallow convection the reduced Tiedtke scheme was applied (Tiedtke1989; Baldauf et al.2011). The 3-D COSMO fields are output every 15 min, which allows capturing the large temporal and spatial variability of embedded convection.

To identify phases of embedded convective ascent in the WCB, 10 000 online trajectories are started from a predefined region at seven vertical levels (250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500 m a.s.l.) every 2 h during the simulation. The online trajectory positions are calculated from the resolved 3-D wind field at every model time step, i.e., every 20 s, and thus explicitly capture rapid convective ascent (Miltenberger et al.2013, 2014; Rasp et al.2016; Oertel et al.2019). WCB trajectories are subsequently selected as trajectories with an ascent rate of at least 600 hPa in 48 h (Madonna et al.2014).

2.2 Overview of WCB case study

The investigated WCB is associated with the North Atlantic Extratropical Cyclone Vladiana that occurred between 22 and 25 September 2016, IOP 3 of the North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact EXperiment (NAWDEX, Schäfler et al.2018). The cyclone with a minimum sea level pressure of 975 hPa on 23 September is located below an upper-level trough and propagates eastward across the North Atlantic toward Iceland (Fig. 2), where it becomes stationary on 24–25 September. The cyclone's WCB ascends in the warm sector predominantly in a narrow band ahead of the cold front and develops a weak cyclonic and a stronger anticyclonic branch (cf. Wernli1997; Martínez-Alvarado et al.2014), which turns into the downstream upper-level ridge and contributes to its amplification (see Fig. 2d–f in Oertel et al.2019). A more detailed analysis of the cyclone evolution and its WCB ascent is presented in Oertel et al. (2019).

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f02

Figure 2Overview of the WCB ascent for Cyclone Vladiana: (a–c) locations of WCB air parcel ascent (circles; colors indicate centered 2 h pressure change, Δp2 h, along all ascending WCB trajectories, in hPa), SLP (grey contours, in hPa), and 2 PVU at 320 K (red line) for (from a to c) 22:00 UTC, 22 September; 10:00 UTC, 23 September; and 22:00 UTC, 23 September. (d–f) PV at 320 K and SLP (grey contours, in hPa) for the same times as (a)(c). All panels show the position of the cyclone center (L).

The WCB trajectories in the baroclinic zone ahead of the cyclone's cold front vary considerably in their ascent rates (Fig. 2a–c; see also the animation in the Supplement) and also include phases of embedded convection. These phases are characterized by a rapid ascent of more than 400–600 hPa in 2 h, and they are embedded in a larger region of slower, more gradual WCB ascent (red circles in Fig. 2a–c and the Supplement; see Oertel et al.2019). The region of embedded convective activity is characterized by a very heterogeneous PV field of diabatically produced small-scale but high-amplitude PV anomalies of ±10 PVU in the upper troposphere (Fig. 2d–f and the Supplement), suggesting that embedded convection in WCBs can strongly modify the PV distribution. There is, however, no clear separation between convective and slantwise ascent in the WCB of Cyclone Vladiana (Oertel et al.2019). Instead, it is a continuum of ascent rates ranging from very rapid convective ascent of more than 600 hPa in 2 h to a slower gradual ascent of approximately 50 hPa in 2 h. Nevertheless, we can meaningfully classify the WCB trajectories into two subcategories based on their ascent rate to compare convective vs. slantwise WCB ascent (see Sect. 2.3).

2.3 WCB trajectory categorization and WCB ascent region

To compare the rapid convective WCB ascent to the “typical” slower and slantwise WCB ascent, we define two subcategories of coherently ascending WCB trajectories: (i) convectively ascending WCB trajectories that perform a rapid quasi-vertical ascent through the whole tropospheric column and (ii) slantwise WCB trajectories that ascend more slowly and gradually from the boundary layer into the upper troposphere. The selection criteria are based on the fastest 400 and 600 hPa ascent phases along the WCB trajectories: a WCB trajectory is considered convective if its fastest 400 and 600 hPa ascent times are shorter than 1 and 3 h, respectively. These ascent rates correspond to the fastest 10 % ascent rates of all trajectories of the considered WCB. Likewise, a WCB trajectory is assigned to the slantwise WCB category if the 400 and 600 hPa ascent times are between 1.5 to 3.5 h and 6.5 to 22 h, respectively. These ascent times correspond to the average ascent rates of all WCB trajectories (25th to 75th percentiles). The selection criteria result in approximately 2000 convective WCB trajectories, and approximately 7000 more slowly ascending slantwise WCB trajectories.

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f03

Figure 3(a) Location of convective (black-outlined circles) and slantwise (grey-outlined triangles) WCB trajectories at the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent phase. Colors indicate the according time of the WCB air parcel position (blue 23 September, red 24 September). Only every fourth trajectory is shown. The evolution of the frontal structures is indicated by θ=293 K at 850 hPa (lines are colored according to the selected times at 04:00 UTC, 23 September; 16:00 UTC, 23 September; 04:00 UTC, 24 September; and 16:00 UTC, 24 September). The asterisks indicate the location of the surface cyclone every 6 h (colored according to time). (b) Temporal evolution of the number of selected convective (red) and slantwise (black) WCB trajectories at the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent phase normalized by the absolute number of selected trajectories in each category and evolution of 15 min accumulated precipitation averaged over the WCB domain shown in (a). Note that for the domain-averaged precipitation only grid points with nonzero precipitation were considered.

Download

Figure 3a shows the temporal evolution of the WCB trajectory positions at the start of their ascent relative to the approaching cold front at selected times. The main WCB ascent occurs ahead of the cold front and the upper-level trough (see the Supplement for more details). The selected convective WCB trajectories perform a rapid and deep ascent through the whole troposphere mostly south of 50 N (Fig. 3a, black outlined circles), and the slantwise WCB trajectories with comparatively slow and gradual ascent rates are located ahead of, and travel northward with, the cold front during their ascent (Fig. 3a, grey outlined triangles). During the 3 d of major WCB ascent from 22 to 24 September 2016, a joint evolution and eastward propagation of about 20 of the cyclone, its cold front and the WCB ascent region takes place (see colored symbols in Fig. 3a). Despite the differing ascent behavior of the WCB categories, the convective WCB ascent is directly embedded in the region of large-scale ascent, i.e., in close proximity of the more slowly ascending WCB trajectories. The convective WCB trajectories start their ascent on average slightly further south at the cold front (45.2±3) compared to the slantwise WCB trajectories whose ascent region extends further poleward (47.7±4). Nevertheless, the overall region of origin and ascent overlaps (Figs. 2a–c and 3a) and the convective WCB ascent is indeed embedded in the region of slower WCB ascent. This indicates that although their ascent rates differ, both WCB categories are not spatially separated (Fig. 3a).

3 Characteristics of convective and slantwise WCB ascent
Back to toptop

3.1 Composite analysis

The similarities and differences of the characteristics of convective and slantwise WCB trajectories are systematically compared in a composite analysis. For computing composites for both WCB categories, the selected WCB trajectories are centered relative to the time of the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent phase. Composites are computed based on the trajectory position every 15 min, which corresponds to the temporal resolution of the COSMO output.

Three types of composites are produced for both WCB categories: (i) composites of vertical profiles along the trajectories, i.e., time–height sections along the flow, and (ii) horizontal and (iii) vertical cross sections centered at the trajectories' geographical position. While the along-flow composites provide a Lagrangian perspective on the local dynamical impact of the WCB trajectories, the horizontal and vertical cross sections allow for analyzing the mutual interaction between the WCB and its surroundings. Because the trajectories are located in a region with coherent background flow ahead of the upper-level trough (see Fig. 2a–c), the fields are not rotated for the composite computation. This enables a direct interpretation of the atmospheric conditions and perturbations in geographic coordinates.

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f04

Figure 4(a, b) Composites of vertical profiles following the motion of the trajectories (the black line shows the mean ascent of all WCB trajectories) for (a) convective WCB trajectories and (b) slantwise WCB trajectories for hydrometeors: sum of rain and snow water content (RWC + SWC, colors, in g kg−1), ice water content (IWC, turquoise contours, every 0.02 g kg−1), liquid water content (LWC, light blue contours, every 0.1 g kg−1), graupel water content (GWC, magenta contours, every 0.4 g kg−1), 0 C isotherm (yellow line), 320 K isentrope (blue line), and the 2 PVU tropopause (red line). (c, d) The 15 min accumulated surface precipitation along the ascent of the (c) convective and (d) slantwise WCB trajectories (blue line, in kg m−2). (e, f) Horizontal cross section composites of vertically integrated rain and snow water content (RWP + SWP, colors, in kg m−2), vertically integrated graupel water content (magenta contours, every 500 g m−2), and 15 min accumulated surface precipitation (blue contours, every 1 kg m−2) for (e) convective WCB trajectories and (f) slantwise WCB trajectories 30 min and 1 h, respectively, after the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent (corresponding to the respective times of maximum surface precipitation). The axes' dimensions denote the distance from the WCB air parcel locations marked as “×” (in km). Note the different time axis of (a, c) and (b, d) and the different horizontal dimensions of (e) and (f).

Download

The number of selected convective and slantwise WCB trajectories is not homogeneous in time; instead pulses of convective and slantwise WCB ascent occur (Fig. 3a and b; see Oertel et al.2019). In particular, two pulses of increased convective activity occur at around 00:00 UTC, 23 September, and 00:00 UTC, 24 September. Hence, the composite analyses are dominated by these times when large numbers of WCB trajectories are selected for each category.

The convective WCB trajectories ascend quasi-vertically from the boundary layer to the upper troposphere to, on average, 10 km height (±1.0 km) in about 1–2 h (Fig. 4a, black line). In contrast, the slantwise WCB trajectories are characterized by a substantially slower ascent (in agreement with our selection criteria) and perform a gradual slantwise ascent until they reach their final outflow level at, on average, 9 km (±1.2 km) height after approximately 18 h, after an initially swift ascent (due to the centering relative to the fastest 400 hPa ascent) in the lower troposphere (Fig. 4b, black line). Thus, the final WCB outflow height of the slantwise WCB trajectories is on average lower than for the convective WCB trajectories.

In the following, we first describe the precipitation and cloud structure associated with the rapid convective and slower slantwise WCB trajectories (Sect. 3.2). Subsequently, we analyze their thermodynamic properties (Sect. 3.3) and compare the environment of both WCB categories (Sect. 3.4). Then, the PV structure associated with convective and slantwise WCB ascent is investigated (Sect. 3.5) and related to the flow anomalies (Sect. 3.6).

3.2 Precipitation and cloud structure

The convective cloud formed during the rapid WCB ascent is characterized by large hydrometeor contents of up to 1 g kg−1 (Fig. 4a) and the vertically integrated rain, snow and graupel water path in close proximity to the updraft can reach up to 6 kg m−2 (Fig. 4e), forming a locally dense and vertically extended cloud (Fig. 4a). Directly above the convective updraft the cloud top height reaches a local maximum (Fig. 4a). During their rapid ascent, the convective WCB trajectories locally produce intense surface precipitation (Fig. 4c and e). The precipitation maximum coincides with the strongest ascent phase in the mid-troposphere (Fig. 4a and c), where a local maximum of graupel production also occurs (Fig. 4a, magenta contours). The maximum surface precipitation is shifted slightly upstream relative to the convective updraft (Fig. 4e). The upper-level WCB outflow remains inside a thick cirrus cloud for several hours, which has formed during the convective ascent and is subsequently advected with the upper-level mean flow (Fig. 4a, turquoise contours). This convectively formed cirrus cloud can be considered a longer-lived convective anvil cloud, suggesting that embedded convection is also relevant for the larger-scale upper-level cloud cover.

The cloud formed during the slantwise WCB ascent is comparatively less dense, with lower rain, ice, and snow water content and without graupel production (Fig. 4b and f). Accordingly, the cloud structure and cloud top are more homogeneous and stratiform, and the surface precipitation maximum along the ascent (Fig. 4d) is substantially weaker compared to the convective WCB ascent (peak value reduced by a factor of 3). The vertically integrated rain, snow and graupel water paths for the slantwise WCB trajectories are substantially lower and distributed homogeneously over a larger area (Fig. 4f). The WCB outflow is surrounded by a cirrus cloud during the entire ascent (Fig. 4b), indicating the relevance of WCBs for the formation and maintenance of the extended upper-level cirrus cloud cover associated with extratropical cyclones (Eckhardt et al.2004; Madonna et al.2014; Oertel et al.2019; Joos2019). The denser cloud (Fig. 4a and b) with limited spatial extent (Fig. 4e and f) in the convective case implies a pronounced heterogeneity of the large-scale cloud structure if convection is directly embedded in the large-scale WCB cloud band.

A previous analysis showed that the precipitating region for the considered cyclone is spatially confined to the WCB ascent region (see Oertel et al.2019, Fig. 9b). Indeed, the (normalized) number of convective and slantwise WCB trajectories starting their fastest ascent both correlate well with the evolution of the averaged (nonzero) precipitation in the WCB domain (Fig. 3b). In particular, both convective ascent pulses clearly coincide with the domain-averaged precipitation maxima, suggesting that the evolution of embedded convection in the WCB has an impact on the precipitation intensity (cf. Fig. 9 in Oertel et al.2019).

The distinctly different cloud and precipitation structure between both WCB trajectory categories underlines the rationale of our classification of convective vs. slantwise ascent, and agrees with typical characteristics of both precipitation types: The convective WCB ascent produces locally confined, intense precipitation including the formation of graupel, while the precipitation associated with the slantwise WCB ascent is much less intense and distributed over a larger domain, whereby the ascent velocity is too slow for graupel production. Hence, the slantwise WCB ascent forms an extended stratiform cloud band.

3.3 Thermodynamic properties

Consistent with the formation of clouds and precipitation, the convective WCB trajectories experience substantial cloud diabatic heating of 35 K on average during the first 3 h, and they reach their outflow level at the 330 K isentrope in agreement with their initial θe value of 330 K (Fig. 5a; see Sect. 3.4). The averaged total cross-isentropic ascent of the slantwise WCB trajectories with lower θe in the inflow is weaker with about 28 K in 18 h when their final outflow level is reached at around 323 K (Fig. 5b). The strong and localized heating in the convective updrafts leads to a local lifting of the melting level (Fig. 4a) and a localized downward deflection of the isentropes in the diabatically heated region (Figs. 6c and 5a).

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f05

Figure 5Composites of vertical profiles following the motion of the trajectories (the black line shows the mean ascent of all WCB trajectories) for (a, c, e) convective WCB trajectories and (b, d, f) slantwise WCB trajectories. The fields shown are (a, b) equivalent potential temperature (θe, colors, in K); potential temperature (θ, dashed grey lines, every 5 K); and the 300, 320, and 340 K isentrope (blue lines); (c, d) moist stability (dθe∕dz, colors, in K km−1), the 320 K isentrope (blue line), and relative humidity (RH, grey contours, in %; 97 % and 99 % RH contours are highlighted in green and lime); (e, f) PV (colors, in PVU), isentropes (dashed lines, every 5 K), the 320 K isentrope (blue line), and in (e) low static stability layers (dθ/dz2 K km−1, white contour and hatching). Note the different time axis in (a, c, e) and (b, d, f).

Download

Both convective and slantwise WCB trajectories ascend only approximately along constant-θe surfaces (Fig. 5a and b) due to the influence of ice microphysical processes during the ascent. The calculation of θe only considers the heat released during the transition from the vapor to the liquid phase and does not account for the additional heat release associated with the ice phase (the transition from the vapor to the ice phase releases the latent heat of condensation plus freezing, Lc+Lf, and the latter is not accounted for in the calculation of θe). Hence, the influence of melting from falling hydrometeors and the phase transitions from liquid to ice above the 0 C isotherm are evident along the WCB ascent. Following the ascent of the convective WCB trajectories from 1 to 4 km height (Fig. 5a), below and near the melting level in the vicinity of the 0 C isotherm, i.e., where a transition from the solid (SWC and GWC) to the liquid (RWC) phase occurs (Fig. 4a), θe decreases along the ascent (Fig. 5a) due to melting of snow and graupel falling into the ascending air parcels. At higher altitudes, i.e., following the trajectories above the melting level at 4 km height, θe increases again due to the additional heat release in the ice phase (Fig. 5a). This process of decrease and subsequent increase in θe along the ascent is also evident in the more slowly ascending WCB trajectories (Fig. 5b), underlining the importance of microphysical processes in WCBs (Joos and Wernli2012; Joos and Forbes2016), whose effect is clearly detectable even after averaging over hundreds of trajectories1.

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f06

Figure 6(a, b) Horizontal cross section composites of θe at 900 hPa (colors, in K), specific humidity (grey contours, every 1 g kg−1), and wind at 900 hPa (arrows) for (a) convective WCB trajectories and (b) slantwise WCB trajectories at the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent. The axes' dimensions denote the distance from the WCB air parcel locations marked as “×” (in km). (c, d) Vertical cross section composite along the northwest–southeast orientated lines shown in (a, b) for horizontal wind divergence (colors, in s−1), equivalent potential temperature (θe, red and blue lines, every 2 K), and potential temperature (θ, dashed grey lines, every 5 K) for (c) convective and (d) slantwise WCB trajectories at the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent. The x axis denotes the zonal distance from the WCB air parcel locations (in km).

Download

3.4 Environment for convective and slantwise WCB ascent

The rapidly ascending convective WCB trajectories originate from a slightly warmer and substantially moister region (θ=296±1.3 K, qv=11.5±1.2 g kg−1) compared to the more slowly ascending slantwise WCB trajectories (θ=295±1.9 K, qv=9.9±1.3 g kg−1) and are thus characterized by substantially higher initial θe (Figs. 6a and 5a) than the slantwise WCB trajectories (Figs. 6b and 5b). At the start of the ascent, θe amounts to 330 K (±4.8 K) for the convective WCB trajectories and to 324 K (±5.9 K) for the slantwise WCB trajectories (Fig. 5a and b). Although the convective ascent is embedded within the region of slantwise ascent ahead of the cold front (Figs. 3 and 6a), where θe contours nearly become vertical (Fig. 6c and d), the convective WCB trajectories ascend from a mesoscale, meridionally elongated region characterized by warmer and more humid conditions ahead of a strong localized θe gradient (Fig. 6a). This narrow tongue of very high θe air with qv exceeding 11 g kg−1 only extends laterally from ahead of the cold front approximately 50 km into the warm sector and forms a strong horizontal θe gradient (Fig. 6a). Moreover, the WCB ascent region ahead of the cold frontal zone coincides with enhanced low-level convergence of the horizontal wind (Fig. 6c and d), which is particularly strong for the convective WCB trajectories. The mesoscale frontal θe structures ahead of the cold front arise from large θe variability in the warm sector. The higher θe of the convective WCB trajectories subsequently leads to more intense cloud diabatic processes and a faster and stronger cross-isentropic ascent (Fig. 5a and b).

The rapidly ascending, convective WCB trajectories (Fig. 5a) originate in the boundary layer from a region of strong potential instability characterized by vertical θe gradients of −4 K km−1 prior to the start of the convective ascent (Fig. 5c). After their rapid ascent from the boundary layer into the upper troposphere, the convective WCB trajectories continue to moderately ascend almost isentropically along the upper-level ridge (Fig. 5a). The convective WCB ascent is likely triggered through lifting of the potentially unstable layer in the frontal ageostrophic circulation (see quasi-geostrophic omega ahead of the cold front in Fig. 6 and Sect. 5.1.2 in Oertel et al.2019). During an initial adiabatic ascent, the low-level potentially unstable layer in the WCB inflow region remains potentially unstable until saturation is reached at the lifting condensation level (Schultz and Schumacher1999; Sherwood2000; Schultz et al.2000). Once the lifting condensation level is reached, the potential instability can be released leading to the identified rapid convective updrafts ahead of the cold front.

In contrast, the slower slantwise WCB trajectories start their ascent from the boundary layer in a region characterized by weaker potential instability and lower relative humidity (Fig. 5d) and ascend on top of the (cold) frontal region characterized by comparatively large potential stability (Fig. 5b and d).

3.5 Vertical and horizontal PV structure

The PV perspective is useful to understand and trace the effect of convection on the atmospheric circulation. In this section, we investigate the 3-D PV structure associated with convective and slantwise WCB ascent and describe the mechanisms that lead to the differing PV distributions associated with the two types of WCB ascent.

The strong localized diabatic heating during the ascent results in a PV production below and a PV destruction above the strongest ascent phase for both WCB categories (Fig. 5e and f), which is characteristic for WCB ascent (e.g., Wernli and Davies1997; Pomroy and Thorpe2000; Madonna et al.2014). In comparison with the more slowly ascending WCB trajectories, the positive PV anomaly formed by convective WCB ascent in particular is much stronger and more localized. The averaged low-level PV monopole below the convective WCB ascent reaches values of up to 4.5 PVU, while it remains below 1.5 PVU for the slantwise WCB ascent. In the WCB outflow, the PV values decrease to approximately 0.2 PVU for both WCB categories (Fig. 5e and f). Despite the stronger and vertically more extended positive low-level PV anomaly produced by the convective WCB trajectories, both types of WCB trajectories lead to an extended region of low-PV air directly in their outflow in the upper troposphere. The outflow of the convective WCB trajectories in particular is associated with a region of low static stability (dθ/dz2 K km−1, Fig. 5e, white hatching).

In the following, we examine the PV structure not only along the WCB trajectories but also in the surroundings of the WCB ascent. Furthermore, we confront the results with the theoretical concept of PV modification and consider the vorticity and static stability structure in the PV anomalies.

3.5.1 Low-level positive PV monopole

Figure 7a shows the PV structure in the lower troposphere below the mean trajectory position 30 min after the start of the convective WCB ascent. In this region, below the level of the diabatic heating maximum, the convective WCB ascent leads to the strong positive PV anomaly identified in the along-flow analysis (Fig. 5e). This mesoscale PV monopole with values up to 4 PVU extends horizontally about 30 km around the convective udpraft and is embedded within, and superimposed on, an environment with a lower-amplitude positive PV anomaly that results from the slower, slantwise WCB ascent (Fig. 7b). In contrast to the strong mesoscale PV monopole formed by the convective WCB ascent, the increased low-level PV values associated with the slantwise WCB ascent have a lower magnitude of around 1.5 PVU. However, the PV anomaly occurs on a larger spatial scale of up to 100 km, with decreasing amplitude away from the WCB ascent.

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f07

Figure 7(a–d) Horizontal cross section composites of PV (colors, in PVU), wind speed (grey arrows, in m s−1), and 2 h circulation anomalies (black arrows, in m s−1) at (a, b) 800 m and (c, d) 320 K for (a, c) convective WCB trajectories 30 min after the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent and (b, d) slantwise WCB trajectories (b) 1 h and (d) 10 h after the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent. The green arrow in (c, d) shows the direction of the vertical wind shear vector (vz) between 4 and 10 km height at the location of WCB ascent. The axes' dimensions denote the distance from the WCB air parcel locations marked as “×” (in km). (e, f) Vertical cross section composites along the northwest–southeast orientated lines shown in (a, b) of PV (colors, in PVU), wind speed (green contours, every 2 m s−1), isentropes (dashed lines, every 5 K), the 320 K isentrope (blue line), and low static stability layers (dθ/dz2 K km−1, white contour and hatching) for (e) convective WCB trajectories and (f) slantwise WCB trajectories 30 min and 1 h, respectively, after the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent. The x axis denotes the zonal distance from the WCB air parcel locations (in km). Note the different spatial dimensions for the convective and slantwise WCB trajectories.

Download

3.5.2 Upper-level PV dipole

In the middle to upper troposphere a coherent mesoscale horizontal PV dipole forms in the vicinity of the convective WCB trajectories, with a positive PV pole of magnitude 3 PVU to the right of the vertical wind shear vector (which points in the same direction as the upper-level wind vector) and a negative PV pole of magnitude −1.5 PVU to the left of the vertical wind shear vector (Fig. 7c and e). This PV dipole extends vertically from about 3 km (305 K) to about 9 km (330 K). The maximum amplitude of the PV dipole occurs at about 315–320 K (Fig. 7e) and coincides with the diabatic heating maximum associated with the maximum of the formation of snow and graupel (Fig. 4a). Similar to the positive PV monopole at low levels, the upper-level PV dipole also extends to about 30–40 km around the center of the convective updraft (Fig. 7c).

This distinct mesoscale PV signal emphasizes the coherent signature of the individual convective updrafts that are embedded within the complex WCB airstream. The robust mesoscale response can only be identified this clearly in the composite analysis. The large-amplitude, small-scale, and fragmentary PV features that occur in the upper troposphere in the region of embedded convection on instantaneous PV charts (Fig. 2; see the Supplement for more information) correspond to such mesoscale PV dipoles formed by the individual convective updrafts embedded in the WCB.

The formation of the PV dipole above the low-level PV monopole in our composite analysis is directly comparable to the PV structure of isolated convective updrafts in a sheared environment (cf. Fig. 2 in Chagnon and Gray2009) or larger-scale convective systems, as discussed in the Introduction. It has, however, not yet explicitly been associated with WCBs identified in reanalysis data and coarser-scale simulations, where the vertical PV dipole structure dominates (e.g., Wernli and Davies1997; Joos and Wernli2012; Madonna et al.2014).

The composites for the slantwise WCB trajectories reveal the typical PV structure of WCBs (e.g., Wernli and Davies1997; Pomroy and Thorpe2000) with a wide region of low-PV air with a magnitude of about 0.5 PVU in the upper-tropospheric WCB outflow above the low-level positive PV anomaly (Figs. 7b, d, f and 5f). The poleward-ascending low-PV air in the WCB outflow spreads out into the upper tropospheric ridge, potentially leading to its amplification (Grams et al.2011; Madonna et al.2014).

3.5.3 Mechanisms leading to the PV structure

To analyze the mechanisms responsible for the formation of these coherent PV anomalies, we consider the material change of PV in the form of Eq. (4), which emphasizes the contributions from the vertical (the first term) and horizontal (the second term) vorticity components and heating gradients, as discussed in the Introduction (Sect. 1.2).

The formation of the low-level positive PV anomaly is mainly due to the strong vertical heating gradient in an environment with large cyclonic vertical vorticity (first term in Eq. 4), such that below the diabatic heating maximum PV is increased (e.g., Stoelinga1996; Wernli and Davies1997; Rossa et al.2000; Joos and Wernli2012; Binder et al.2016). This mechanism is important for PV modification in both the convective and slantwise WCB trajectories, which ascend near the surface cold front, i.e., in a region where absolute vertical vorticity f+ζ is particularly large. Due to the stronger and more localized diabatic heating in the convective WCB ascent, the vertical heating gradient θ˙z is larger and, therefore, the convective WCB ascent leads to a stronger low-level positive PV anomaly. Furthermore, vortex stretching in the convective updraft additionally enhances the low-level absolute vertical vorticity. Together, this can lead to a positive feedback mechanism: PV is diabatically produced in the convective updraft with strong diabatic heating gradients θ˙z. As a consequence, the vertical vorticity is enhanced, supported by vortex stretching. In the following, the diabatic heating gradient acts on amplified vertical vorticity and thus still larger PV anomalies are produced. Finally, this results in increased PV production (see Joos and Wernli2012; Madonna et al.2014).

The midlevel to upper-level convective PV dipole results from the arrangement of horizontal vorticity and the horizontal diabatic heating gradient (second term in Eq. 4; cf. Figs. 1 and 7c). Horizontal vorticity is large ahead of the upper-level trough due to strong vertical wind shear below the upper-level jet. In this case, the vertical wind shear vector of magnitude 2–3 m s−1 km−1 between 4 and 12 km height points in the same direction as the upper-level wind vector, i.e., towards the northeast (Fig. 7c). The horizontal vorticity vector ωh is rotated 90 anticlockwise relative to the vertical wind shear vector and points towards the cold air. Moreover, the horizontal heating gradients hθ˙ point radially towards the center of the convective updraft, which coincides with the maximum heating from graupel and snow formation (Fig. 4a and e). As outlined in the Introduction (Sect. 1.2), this results in PV production to the right of the vertical wind shear vector, where hθ˙ωh, and PV destruction to the left of the vertical wind shear vector, where hθ˙-ωh (Fig. 7c). The convectively produced heating gradients and the background vorticity are strong enough to form a region of absolutely negative PV. These findings from the convective WCB composites agree with the theoretical considerations in the Introduction.

The horizontal diabatic heating gradients for the slantwise WCB ascent are weaker because the diabatic heating is (i) less intense and (ii) spatially more uniform due to a larger-scale gradual ascent (cf. Fig. 4b and f). Thus, for the large-scale slantwise WCB ascent, the vertical component of the PV equation is comparatively more important than the horizontal component, and continuous heating along the ascent leads to PV reduction above the diabatic heating maximum and a transport of low-PV air to the upper troposphere by the trajectories passing through this low-PV region. However, PV values remain positive because PV cannot change sign if the first term in Eq. (4) dominates (Harvey et al.2020). We conclude that for the slantwise WCB ascent the vertical component of the PV equation is most relevant, while for embedded convection with localized and intense heating gradients the horizontal components of the PV equation are essential to explain the resulting upper-level PV dipole structure, which includes negative PV values.

3.5.4 Partitioning of PV anomalies in vorticity and static stability

Negative PV implies either hydrostatic, inertial, or symmetric instability (e.g., Hoskins2015). In the following, we analyze the partitioning of the PV anomalies in vorticity and static stability and discuss its implication for the expected lifetime of these anomalies. The PV dipole is associated with a dipole of absolute vertical vorticity f+ζ with similar magnitude in both poles (Fig. 8b) and thus can be understood as the effect of tilting of horizontal vorticity by the convective updraft (see Chagnon and Gray2009). Moreover, strong heating in the convective updraft leads to increased static stability inside the updraft (dθ/dz=3–5 K km−1; not shown) and a shallow layer of low static stability (dθ/dz2 K km−1, Figs. 5e and 7e) above. The static stability is relatively uniform across both poles. Hence, the PV dipole's horizontal structure is predominantly determined by vorticity and not static stability. This is consistent with Chagnon and Gray (2009), who also found that in convective updrafts the so-called “latent vorticity” is quickly converted to horizontal dipoles of vertical vorticity that determine the PV dipole structure.

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f08

Figure 8The same as Fig. 7a and c but for absolute vertical vorticity (f+ζ, in s−1) and 2 h circulation anomalies (black arrows, in m s−1) at (a) 800 m and (b) 320 K for convective WCB trajectories 30 min after the start of the fastest 400 hPa ascent. The 0 and 2 PVU contour lines are shown in blue and red, respectively.

Download

In Sect. 4.2 we will see that the negative PV pole, produced by convective WCB trajectories, persists for several hours. This is consistent with adjustment timescales of several hours (e.g., Thompson et al.2018) in inertially unstable regions where f+ζ<0. A convectively unstable atmosphere (dθ/dz<0), in contrast, would adjust to stability on a timescale of less than 1 h (Schultz and Schumacher1999).

The static stability reduction above the slantwise WCB is weaker compared to the convective WCB, but the slantwise WCB leads to a reduced static stability over a larger region (Fig. 7f). In the outflow of the slantwise WCB, relative vorticity is weakly negative and absolute vertical vorticity is weakly positive (not shown).

The low-level positive PV anomalies for convective and slantwise WCB ascent are associated with large cyclonic vertical vorticity f+ζ, whereby the convective WCB has higher values, exceeding 6×10-4 s−1 (Fig. 8a), compared to the slantwise WCB with values of (3–4)×10-4 s−1 (not shown).

3.6 Flow anomalies induced by PV anomalies

In agreement with idealized PV inversions (e.g., Hoskins et al.1985; Hoskins2015), where a positive PV anomaly induces a cyclonic flow anomaly, and a negative PV anomaly induces an anticyclonic circulation anomaly, respectively, the convectively produced PV dipoles are associated with coherent horizontal wind anomalies, calculated as the deviation of the current wind vectors from the 2 h centered mean wind vectors. The low-level positive PV monopole is accompanied by a cyclonic circulation anomaly with about 4 m s−1 higher wind speeds southeast of the convective updraft and smaller values to the northeast (Fig. 7a and e). Despite this relatively strong local wind anomaly, its radius of impact is limited and the effect of the PV anomaly substantially decays beyond 40 km from the updraft. As hypothesized by Raymond and Jiang (1990), the relatively long-lived low-level positive PV anomalies interact with the background shear and thus could trigger new convective cells through the formation of local convergence lines on the downshear side. In this way, convective activity could be maintained.

The positive PV monopole from the slantwise WCB trajectories also induces a cyclonic low-level circulation anomaly (Fig. 7b). Yet, it hardly exceeds 1 m s−1 and occurs on a larger spatial scale, in agreement with the comparatively weaker and larger-scale positive PV anomaly. The initial slantwise WCB ascent occurs directly behind the pronounced low-level jet ahead of the cold front (Fig. 7b and f). This jet, which exceeds 24 m s−1, is very slightly accelerated by the diabatically produced positive PV and the associated cyclonic circulation anomaly ahead of the WCB ascent region. This pattern agrees with the synoptic situation of early WCB studies (e.g., Fig. 5 in Wernli1997), where the ascent region of the slantwise WCB is located ahead of the upper-level jet and behind the low-level jet.

The convectively produced upper-level PV dipole is associated with a cyclonic and anticyclonic circulation anomaly around the positive and negative PV poles, respectively (Fig. 7c and e). The superposition of these two flows leads to a deceleration of the flow in the center of the PV dipoles and potentially reduces the rapid dispersion of the convective cloud with the upper-level flow (see Oertel2020, chap. 7). At 320 K, this induced wind anomaly reaches almost 3 m s−1 close to the convective updraft.

The weaker negative upper-level PV anomaly of the more slowly ascending WCB trajectories goes along with a widespread weak anticyclonic circulation anomaly (Fig. 7d), with a maximum anticyclonic wind speed anomaly of less than 0.5 m s−1 northwest of the WCB ascent. The more slowly ascending WCB trajectories arrive in the upper troposphere in the vicinity of the tropopause.

In summary, both WCB categories are associated with a cyclonic low-level circulation anomaly induced by the low-level positive PV anomaly. The wind anomaly in the convective case is stronger but the extent is limited, while the wind anomaly in the slantwise WCB category is substantially weaker but extends to a larger region. In the upper troposphere two different circulation anomalies become established. The slantwise WCB ascent induces a widespread and comparatively weak anticyclonic circulation anomaly. In contrast, the anticyclonic and cyclonic circulation anomalies induced by the convectively generated PV dipole occur on a smaller scale and lead to a deceleration of the flow in the center of the convective updraft.

4 PV anomalies on a larger scale and relevance for large-scale dynamics
Back to toptop

Section 3 showed that the individual convective updrafts are associated with mesoscale upper-level PV dipoles that are, however, too small-scale to directly interact with the synoptic-scale balanced flow (see Shutts2017). Section 4.1 illustrates that these fragmentary PV anomalies can indeed aggregate to larger-scale PV dipole bands. Thereafter, we assess the potential for the interaction of convectively produced PV dipole bands with the synoptic-scale flow. For this, we coarse-grain the PV field with a 60 km smoothing radius (see Shutts2017; Clarke et al.2019). More specifically, we project the original 2 km PV field to a coarser grid using a spatial moving average over 60 km × 60 km directly on selected isentropes.

4.1 An illustrative example of WCB-embedded convection

Figure 9 shows an instantaneous example of convection embedded in the large-scale WCB cloud structure at 09:00 UTC, 23 September 2016, and serves to illustrate the typical properties and characteristics deduced from the composite analysis in a real synoptic context. Based on this example we will discuss the lifetime of the convectively generated PV dipoles and their potential for the interaction with the larger-scale flow (Sect. 4.2).

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f09

Figure 9Example of embedded convection in the WCB at 09:00 UTC, 23 September 2016. (a) Pseudo-IR satellite image of the large-scale cloud structure (data from 10.8 µm channel, EUMETSAT, Schmetz et al.2002) and 2 PVU contour at 320 K (red line). (b) Vertically integrated hydrometeor content (VIHC, in kg m−2, colors for VIHC > 5 g m−2) for the region outlined in (a) (grey box), envelope of rapid WCB ascent (white outline, WCB trajectory ascent > 320 hPa in 2 h), and 2 PVU contour at 320 K (red line). (c) Coarse-grained PV at 320 K (colors, in PVU; purple, blue, orange, and red contour lines show −1, 0, 1, and 2 PVU; see text for details), 2 h circulation anomalies at 320 K (black arrows), wind speed at 320 K (grey arrows), and envelope of rapid WCB ascent (white outline). (d) Enlargement of embedded convection shown in (c) (grey box) with PV at 320 K from the original 2 km model grid, 2 h circulation anomalies at 320 K (black arrows), and envelope of rapid WCB ascent (white outline). (e) Enlargement of embedded convection shown in (c) with equivalent potential temperature at 900 hPa (θe, in K) and envelope for rapid WCB ascent (white outline). (f) The same as (e) but for low-level wind divergence at 295 K (colors, in s−1), PV (coarse-grained to 12 km) at 295 K (yellow, lime, and magenta contour lines at 2, 4, and 5 PVU), and envelope of rapid WCB ascent (white outline).

The large-scale WCB cloud band (Fig. 9a) is heterogeneously structured with a strong and localized production of graupel, snow, and rain (Fig. 9b) caused by enhanced updrafts from embedded convection. Embedded convection, identified by rapidly ascending WCB trajectories (Fig. 9b and c, white contours), is predominantly located in the baroclinic region ahead of the upper-level trough (Fig. 9b and c, white contours). Indeed, the online trajectories' ability to identify the convective ascent is confirmed by the vertical cross section through an embedded convective updraft (Fig. 10a): a substantial amount of hydrometeors are locally produced inside the convective updraft. This spatial coincidence of pronounced hydrometeor production within the updrafts (compare Figs. 9b, c and 10a) agrees with the results from the composite analysis (Fig. 4a and e).

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f10

Figure 10Vertical cross section through the PV dipole shown in Fig. 9c (black line) at 09:00 UTC, 23 September 2016, for (a) the sum of rain, snow, and graupel water content (RWC + SWC + GWC, colors, in g kg−1); cloudy region (grey shading, hydrometeor content > 1 mg kg−1); upper-level jet (yellow and green shading at 55 and 60 m s−1); 2 PVU contour (dark red line); (b) PV (colors, in PVU); and low static stability layers (dθ/dz2 K km−1, white contour and hatching). Isentropes (dashed contours, every 5 K) and the 320 K isentrope (blue line) are shown in both panels.

Download

Although the upper-level PV associated with the convective updrafts is fragmented into many small-scale features (Fig. 9d), the PV structure identified in the composite analysis (cf. Fig. 7e) is clearly discernible in a vertical cross section through the convective updraft (Fig. 10b): in the lower troposphere a strong positive PV monopole forms, which is replaced by a horizontal PV dipole centered around the convective updraft in the middle to upper troposphere. The PV dipole extends from around 4 to 11 km height and the PV values exceed ±10 PVU, leading to large horizontal PV gradients of up to 1 PVU km−1.

In agreement with the composite analysis, the static stability at the height of maximum diabatic heating at around 320 K is increased (not shown), while above the heating maximum a lens of low static stability forms across the negative and positive PV poles (Fig. 10b, white contour and hatching). Thus, the mesoscale PV dipole pattern with an extent of approximately 100 km across both poles originates predominantly from the spatial variability of vertical vorticity, in agreement with the composite analysis (Fig. 8b and Sect. 3.5).

The composite analysis (Sect. 3.4) revealed that the convective WCB trajectories ascend in a region characterized by substantially higher θe that forms a narrow elongated tongue of warm and moist air ahead of the cold front. Figure 9e emphasizes the strong heterogeneity of θe in the warm sector and confirms the spatial coincidence of rapid WCB ascent (Fig. 9e, white contours) and the localized narrow structures of high θe air. This underlines the role of the mesoscale temperature and humidity gradients for triggering convection that is directly embedded within the large-scale slantwise WCB ascent.

In the lower troposphere an elongated zone of horizontal wind convergence concurs with the convective updraft region (Fig. 9f). This low-level convergence line coincides with a band of increased low-level PV (Fig. 9f, contour lines), which is generated and potentially further enhanced by continuous convective ascent (see Sect. 3.5.1).

On a larger scale (after a coarse graining of the PV field to a 60 km × 60 km grid), the convective region forms a meridionally elongated and narrow upper-level PV dipole band with an extension of 100 km in the across-front direction and more than 400 km in the along-front direction, respectively (Fig. 9c). The orientation of this dipole band is aligned with the vertical wind shear vector and the elongated narrow band of convective activity ahead of the cold front and the upper-level trough and is directed to the northeast. Hence, despite the small-scale noise in the PV field formed by the individual convective updrafts (Fig. 9d), the PV anomalies spatially aggregate to a coherent and robust PV structure on the larger scale (Fig. 9c). The formation of this elongated PV dipole band parallel to the convective region is consistent with theoretical considerations (Eq. 4 and Fig. 1) and the composite analysis, despite the different size of the PV dipole of the individual convective updrafts (Fig. 7c) and the larger-scale coarse-grained PV dipole band (Fig. 9c). The formation of these PV dipole bands on either side of elongated convective ascent regions can be observed at various times ahead of the upper-level trough in this WCB case study (not shown).

A larger-scale circulation anomaly establishes around the coarse-grained PV dipole band with cyclonic and anticyclonic wind anomalies around the positive and negative poles, respectively (Fig. 9c). The wind anomalies scale with the amplitude of the PV anomalies and are particularly strong in the region where the coarse-grained PV anomalies exceed ±2 PVU. Note that the wind anomalies are not coarse-grained, emphasizing that the organized mesoscale PV features aggregate to coherent PV anomalies, which are directly associated with a dynamical response on the larger scale.

The associated circulation anomaly leads to an increase in the wind speed to the northwest and southeast of the negative and positive pole, respectively, and to a deceleration of the flow in the PV dipole's center (Fig. 9c and d). Although the far-field effect of the PV anomalies reaches beyond the region where PV is directly modified, the upper-level waveguide is located more than 250 km to the northwest of the convective band, and therefore at this particular time when convection forms the PV dipole, the circulation anomaly does not yet directly influence the upper-level waveguide.

In summary, this instantaneous, Eulerian analysis of WCB-embedded convection agrees with the composite analysis in Sect. 3 and illustrates the typical properties of WCB-embedded convection: strong and localized diabatic heating inside a dense and precipitating cloud leads to the formation of mesoscale upper-level PV dipoles that are associated with a coherent larger-scale circulation anomaly.

4.2 Temporal evolution of the convectively generated upper-level PV dipole

At the time of the initial formation of the PV dipole band, its associated circulation anomaly does not directly reach the upper-level waveguide (Figs. 9c and 11a). Yet, the temporal evolution of upper-level PV reveals that, even after the convective updrafts cease, the negative PV band persists (Fig. 11a–d): the evolution of the negative PV feature under consideration (blue contour in Fig. 11 with pink shading) shows that during its relatively long lifetime of several hours, the negative PV pole is advected by the upper-level wind to the north and toward the dynamical tropopause. The negative PV appears to be approximately conserved and, a couple of hours after the convective updraft ceases, the negative PV band has approached the upper-level jet (distance now only about 150 km) and the adjacent wind speed at the jet is increased by approximately 5 m s−1 to more than 60 m s−1 (Fig. 11c).

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f11

Figure 11Spatially averaged upper-level PV at 320 K (dark blue, blue, orange and red contours at −1, 0, 1, and 2 PVU), upper-level jet at 320 K (yellow and green colors at 55, 60, and 65 m s−1), and envelope of rapid WCB ascent (grey contour and shading) at (a) 09:00 UTC, (b) 12:00 UTC, (c) 15:00 UTC, and (d) 18:00 UTC, 23 September 2016. The pink shading shows the positions of forward trajectories initialized in a region of convectively produced negative PV between 315 and 325 K at 09:00 UTC. Panel (e) is an enlargement of (d) and additionally shows the 2 h circulation anomaly (black arrows). Panel (f) is a vertical cross section along the line shown in (d) for PV (colors, in PVU), potential temperature (dashed grey lines, every 5 K), 320 K isentrope (blue line), and jet (yellow and green contours, at 55, 60, 65, and 70 m s−1). Low static stability layers (dθ/dz2 K km−1) are indicated by the white contour and hatching.

To confirm the advection of the negative PV air by the upper-level flow, forward trajectories are started inside the negative PV anomaly at the time when the PV dipole band is formed by the embedded convection (Fig. 11a, pink shading; for more details about the trajectory computation, see below): The positions of these forward trajectories (Fig. 11a–d, pink shading) mostly coincide with a negative PV region, particularly within the first 3–6 h.

After 9 h, the negative PV pole, distorted in shape due to the influence of strong horizontal wind shear in the jet region, closely approaches the waveguide and thereby strongly increases the isentropic PV gradient near the tropopause (Fig. 11d and e). The strong anticyclonic circulation anomaly associated with the negative PV anomaly accelerates the jet and forms a local jet streak (Figs. 11d and e) that is maintained for 2–3 h. This local jet intensification occurs, although the magnitude of the negative PV feature during its advection decreases (Fig. 11f) compared to the initial strength immediately after its formation (Fig. 10b). The area covered by negative PV values, on the other hand, increases on the considered isentrope (Figs. 11a–d, blue contours). This negative PV anomaly in the ridge ahead of the upper-level trough appears to amplify the amplitude of the preexisting PV pattern at the waveguide.

With increasing time after the initial PV dipole formation, the negative PV pole overtakes the positive PV pole (Fig. 11a–d, orange and red contours) due to strong horizontal wind shear, i.e., decreasing upper-level wind with increasing distance to the jet. In contrast to the negative PV pole that is advected towards the waveguide, the positive PV anomaly remains in the ridge and away from the waveguide.

4.3 Analysis of trajectories initialized at 09:00 UTC, 23 September

The origin and fate of the negative PV air is analyzed in more detail using offline trajectories with 15 min temporal resolution. For this, forward and backward trajectories are computed from a region of convectively produced negative PV (Fig. 11a, pink shading). We only select trajectories with negative PV values between 315 and 325 K that are located within a larger region of spatially averaged negative PV at 09:00 UTC, 23 September (Figs. 11a and 12a).

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f12

Figure 12(a) A 2-D histogram of temporal evolution of PV (in PVU) for forward and backward trajectories initialized in a region of convectively produced negative PV between 315 and 325 K at 09:00 UTC, as shown in Fig. 11a (pink shading). The time is given relative to the trajectory start at 09:00 UTC. The green line shows PV averaged over all trajectories (in PVU). (b) Fraction of trajectories with a negative PV value (black, in %), the fraction of trajectories located above 600 hPa (solid grey, in %) and below 600 hPa (dashed grey, in %). Additionally, the fraction of trajectories with negative PV above 600 hPa (solid blue, in %) and below 600 hPa (dashed blue , in %) and the fraction of trajectories with positive PV above 600 hPa (solid red, in %) and below 600 hPa (dashed red, in %) are shown. Note that after t=0 h the majority of trajectories is located above 600 hPa. Panel (c) is the same as (a) but for pressure (in hPa).

Download

For the analysis of trajectories starting in the upper troposphere, offline (in contrast to online) trajectories have to be considered because the online trajectories are only started in the lower troposphere to obtain a large number of strongly ascending trajectories. Due to computational costs (memory allocation) the number of online trajectories is limited. As a consequence, online trajectories arriving in the upper troposphere have all performed a deep ascent from lower levels. However, these strongly ascending trajectories do not primarily experience the strongest PV modification (see below). Hence, the amount of available online trajectories in the target region (i.e., the region with negative PV in the upper troposphere) is too small. Finally, the online trajectories can only be computed forward and not backward.

With the backward trajectories, however, we can infer when, relative to 09:00 UTC, 23 September (which we will refer to as t=0 h), the negative PV air masses acquired their negative PV and where they originate from (Fig. 12). Only 6 h before, fewer than 10 % of these trajectories have negative PV values, while 3 h earlier this percentage amounts to 30 % (Fig. 12b, black curve). After t=-1 h, more than 40 % of trajectories additionally acquire a negative PV value through the remote effect of localized heating as they pass through a convectively influenced region (not shown), i.e., a region to the left of the convective updraft region and the vertical wind shear vector, where PV is reduced (cf. Fig. 1). Thus, the majority of trajectories acquire their negative PV only within the last 1–2 h (Fig. 12b) while passing a convectively influenced region, predominantly located west of the convective updraft region. This process and a more detailed analysis of the backward trajectories are shown in Oertel (2020, chap. 4.5).

From all trajectories with negative PV at t=0 h, almost 70 % were previously advected quasi-isentropically with the upper-level flow, and a smaller percentage (30 %) ascended from the lower to the middle troposphere (Fig. 12b, grey curves and Fig. 12c), with few of them being inside a convective region. The percentage of upper-level trajectories with negative PV advected into the negative PV region increases with time (Fig. 12b, solid blue curve) because upstream convection produced negative upper-level PV 1–3 h earlier (see Oertel2020, chap. 4.5). This air mass is then advected and contributes to the larger-scale region of negative PV at t=0 h. The strongest increase in the percentage of upper-level trajectories with a negative PV value occurs at t=-1 h (Fig. 12b, solid blue curve), when strong convection sets in and reduces the PV of the trajectories to the left of the convective updraft, similar to what was shown for t=0 h (Fig. 11a). Trajectories that ascend from lower levels (Fig. 12c) and contribute to the larger-scale region of negative PV at t=0 h mainly have PV values within the range of ±10 PVU before they ascend to the upper troposphere (Fig. 12a). However, the percentage of trajectories with negative PV ascending from the lower troposphere is small and does not exceed 10 % (Fig. 12b, dashed blue curve).

These results suggest that the larger-scale region of upper-level negative PV consists of air masses with the following different origins: (i) a large percentage of trajectories (approximately 30 %) with negative PV are formed by upstream convection approximately 3 h earlier and is advected quasi-isentropically by the upper-level flow. (ii) A substantial fraction of air parcels (approximately 40 %) originating from the upper troposphere acquires negative PV values only within the last 1 h through local convective influence as they pass the left side of a convective updraft. (iii) Only a small fraction of trajectories contributing to the upper-level negative PV at t=0 h originates from the lower to middle troposphere with positive PV (approximately 10 % of the trajectories are located in the lower troposphere and have positive PV values at t=−3 h), whereby these rising trajectories acquire a negative PV value during their ascent or after arrival in the upper troposphere when they pass through a convectively influenced region. Finally, (iv) the smallest fraction of less than 10 % contains trajectories that ascend from lower levels with an already negative PV 3 h prior to their ascent.

Although there is some uncertainty in the calculation of the offline trajectories with 15 min temporal resolution, these results suggest that air masses that acquire negative PV originate from a region in close proximity to convection but not necessarily from inside the convective updraft. Moreover, this indicates that the maintenance of convective ascent for at least a few hours helps to generate a larger region of negative PV through advection of negative PV air from upstream convection.

Whereas the backward trajectories allowed analyzing the PV history of the air parcels, the forward trajectories consider the future evolution of their PV. Within the first 3–6 h, the forward trajectories remain mostly within a negative PV region (Fig. 11a–d, pink shading), and the majority of trajectories keep their negative PV values (Fig. 12a). This emphasizes the persistence of the negative PV and supports the previous finding that the negative PV region is advected by the upper-level flow (Fig. 11). After 6 h, the trajectories spread out spatially and cover a larger region due to the strong horizontal and vertical wind shear, but 57 % of the trajectories still have negative PV. The negative PV is retained for a relatively long time, and even after more than 12 h more than 50 % of the trajectories still have negative PV (Fig. 12b) and contribute to some extent to a widespread larger-scale negative PV anomaly (Fig. 11d and e, pink shading), which induces an anticyclonic circulation anomaly in proximity to the tropopause.

Together, these results suggest that air masses in the vicinity of convective updrafts experience strong PV destruction, which contributes to a larger region of negative PV with a coherent anticyclonic circulation anomaly. The convectively generated negative PV is characterized by a relatively long lifetime and is advected northward towards the upper-level jet, where it interacts with the upper-level waveguide, strengthens the isentropic PV gradient, and is associated with the formation of a jet streak.

5 Discussion and open question
Back to toptop

In the following we discuss our results, remaining open questions, and limitations of this study. In this WCB case study, embedded convection was frequently observed and consistently associated with elongated upper-level PV dipole bands, whereby the negative PV pole was advected poleward towards the jet where it interacted with the waveguide. However, the analysis of only one case study limits the generality of the key results, i.e., the frequent occurrence of convectively produced PV dipole bands in WCBs and their influence on the upper-level jet. Due to the wide range of synoptic situations that can be associated with WCB ascent, we expect a large case-to-case variability of the resulting PV signal. For example, a case study of a WCB associated with an upper-level PV cut-off in October 2016 in the North Atlantic region generated weaker and less consistent PV dipoles (Oertel2020, chap. 6).

Despite the large variability of WCB ascent behavior, we hypothesize that the WCB ascent regions are generally favorable environments for the production of PV dipole bands and the occurrence of negative PV in proximity to the tropopause (cf. Harvey et al.2020), as they frequently ascend in the baroclinic region of extratropical cyclones characterized by substantial vertical wind shear. While the occurrence of negative PV in ridges of midlatitude cyclones in proximity to the tropopause has already been reported from model simulations (e.g., Pomroy and Thorpe2000; Grams et al.2011; Chagnon et al.2013; Rowe and Hitchman2016; Harvey et al.2020) and observations (Harvey et al.2020), it has not yet been explicitly associated with embedded convection in WCBs. The extension of this analysis to further WCB case studies – including the investigation of embedded convection, its PV signature and its dynamical relevance – would shed light on the generality of our key results. In particular, the identified impact of embedded convection on the dynamics and precipitation pattern requires a climatological quantification of the frequency of convective vs. slantwise WCB ascent. However, the investigation of numerous WCB case studies in convection-permitting models is computationally expensive because of the large domain covered by the WCB and the need for online trajectories.

A study of an extratropical cyclone by Chagnon et al. (2013) suggested that diabatic processes do not necessarily alter the PV directly at the tropopause but rather in its environment, resulting in the steepening of the PV gradient across the tropopause. They showed that negative PV had been diabatically modified within the WCB outflow region at the equatorward side of the upper-level waveguide and subsequently stretched out in the ridge through nonlinear advection, similar to the behavior of the convectively generated negative PV during poleward advection into the ridge in this case study (Sect. 4.2, Fig. 11). In their case study, the negative PV, resulting from parameterized convection, large-scale microphysical processes, and boundary layer processes, was in phase with the meridional PV gradient. This resulted in the amplification of the wave and thus was associated with faster Rossby wave growth rates and enhanced westward propagation relative to the flow. Similarly, the negative PV bands formed by WCB-embedded convection close to the tropopause are in phase with the meridional PV gradient and thus also enhance the wave amplitude and steepen the PV gradient. Hence, the advection of the convectively generated negative PV pole towards the waveguide further enhances the horizontal PV gradient at the tropopause, in addition to the increase in the tropopause sharpness via the slantwise WCB ascent, as reported by Chagnon et al. (2013) and Chagnon and Gray (2015). This approximation of negative PV and the waveguide also locally accelerates the jet and, potentially, influences the propagation of Rossby waves (Harvey et al.2016), both highly relevant aspects for numerical weather prediction.

During its poleward advection towards the tropopause, the negative PV pole wraps anticyclonically due to the strong wind shear near the jet and expands in the ridge (see Chagnon et al.2013). This expansion increases the influence of PV on the induced velocity, as larger-scale PV anomalies more strongly affect the velocity field (Hoskins et al.1985). Moreover, this stresses that, although embedded convection locally strongly impacts the precipitation, cloud structure, and the mesoscale flow during the convective updraft, the impact on the large-scale dynamics occurs mostly downstream and several hours after the convective updraft ceases.

As discussed in the previous paragraph, the propagation of convectively generated bands of negative PV towards the waveguide is dynamically relevant due its impact on the tropopause sharpness, on the upper-level jet and potentially on the propagation speed of Rossby waves. This interaction of the negative PV pole with the upper-level waveguide can be observed several times during the life cycle of Cyclone Vladiana (e.g., Fig. 11). Based on the analysis of these examples, Fig. 13 schematically illustrates the different stages of convectively generated negative PV embedded in the WCB ascent region from its initial formation to its slow decay at the anticyclonic shear side of the upper-level ridge.

http://www.weather-clim-dynam.net/1/127/2020/wcd-1-127-2020-f13

Figure 13Schematic illustration of different stages of convectively generated PV (orange and blue colors for the positive and negative PV poles, respectively) and the associated jet structure (green contours); (a) PV dipole band; (b) meridional alignment; (c) distorted negative PV and weakened positive PV (light orange); (d) stretched negative PV band. See text for details.

Download

Initially, the aggregation of embedded convection parallel to the upper-level jet forms a coherent larger-scale elongated PV dipole band parallel to the upper-level jet (Fig. 13a). After its initial formation, the negative PV band overtakes the positive PV band due to the horizontal wind shear near the jet and gets distorted in shape (Fig. 13b). This results in a reorientation of the PV dipole bands, such that the distorted, almost circular negative and positive PV features are meridionally aligned, with the negative PV pole to the north and the positive PV pole to the south. At this stage, the PV dipoles induce a circulation anomaly towards the west that facilitates the westward propagation of the negative PV relative to the approaching waveguide, which is the prerequisite for the direct interaction between the upper-level jet and the negative PV feature. As the propagation of the negative PV band towards the waveguide is observed several times in this case study (shown exemplarily for one such event in Sect. 4.2), we hypothesize that the induced wind field at this stage is a coherent feature that supports the advection of the negative PV air westward relative to the approaching trough. Once the negative PV feature is located in close proximity to the waveguide in the northern part of the ridge, it is distorted and stretches out (Fig. 13c) and finally forms a narrow band of negative PV directly at the anticyclonic shear side of the jet (Fig. 13d), where the magnitude of the negative PV slowly decays. Figure 13 also illustrates the acceleration of the upper-level jet (Fig. 13b) and the formation of a jet streak (Fig. 13c and d), when the negative PV pole approaches the upper-level jet (cf. Harvey et al.2020).

Currently, global forecast models (e.g., IFS, MetUM, GFS) are run with a coarser resolution that is unable to explicitly resolve convection. This leads to the question of whether these schemes are able to trigger embedded convection at the right place and time and with the correct amplitude and whether the PV dipoles generated by localized heating from the convection parameterization scheme have the correct magnitude. For instance, previous studies showed that the PV anomaly's amplitude generated by the convection scheme is weaker compared to the amplitude in high-resolution convection-permitting simulations (Done et al.2006; Clarke et al.2019), which, in the case of a large mesoscale convective system, subsequently influenced the downstream flow evolution and decreased the forecast quality (Clarke et al.2019). To explicitly simulate the mesoscale upper-level PV dipoles, a horizontal grid spacing of approximately 2 km would be required to resolve the individual convective updrafts.

The organized mesoscale PV features in the convective ascent region on the original 2 km grid can aggregate to coherent PV anomalies on the large-scale that are directly associated with a dynamical response on the large-scale. This agrees with the electrostatics analogy of PV (Bishop and Thorpe1994), which suggests that locally confined PV “charges” each induce a certain far-field effect on the flow and the superposition can be attributed to the spatially integrated PV anomaly. This implies that the linear superposition principle is applicable to PV, which denotes that the effects of individual PV anomalies on the flow field are additive (Bishop and Thorpe1994; Birkett and Thorpe1997). Although the linear superposition is only exactly valid for quasi-geostrophic PV, Thorpe and Bishop (1995) and Birkett and Thorpe (1997) suggested that the nonlinear contributions for Ertel PV decrease with distance and with decreasing amplitude of the PV anomaly and can therefore likely be neglected. This study supports their conclusion because the convective PV anomalies aggregate to coherent larger-scale PV anomalies with a distinct effect on the flow field.

While embedded convection is directly relevant for numerical weather prediction due to its potential impact on surface precipitation, mesoscale winds, jet speed, and Rossby wave propagation, the relevance of correctly representing embedded convection in climate simulations is less obvious. Nevertheless, the misrepresentation of embedded convection in WCBs could underestimate the projected surface precipitation extremes associated with extratropical cyclones. Moreover, the large-scale cloud band of WCBs is known to modify the radiative balance (Joos2019), which is still a highly uncertain process in climate simulations (e.g., Boucher et al.2013; Vial et al.2013; Bony et al.2015; Caldwell et al.2016). A systematic underestimation of embedded convection and its influence on the cloud structure could potentially influence the radiative balance because, on the one hand, convection results in a substantially denser cloud band. On the other hand, convectively generated liquid-origin cirrus clouds (see Krämer et al.2016; Luebke et al.2016; Wernli et al.2016) spread out in the WCB outflow and travel poleward. The formation pathway of cirrus clouds leads to different microphysical and macrophysical properties (e.g., Krämer et al.2016; Luebke et al.2016), which can influence the cirrus cloud radiative forcing (Zhang et al.1999; Joos et al.2014).

Finally, we showed that the formation of the PV dipole through embedded convection is a relatively fast processes, while the decay of the (dynamically unstable) negative PV pole, with a lifetime of several hours, is comparatively slow. It is not yet clear which nonconservative processes, e.g., turbulence, microphysics, or radiation, lead to the destruction of the negative PV in the ridge, i.e., the production of PV in regions of negative PV, and if other nonconservative processes additionally decrease PV, resulting in the maintenance of the negative PV feature. A novel diagnostic to analyze the PV tendencies from each parameterization scheme available for the ECMWF's Integrated Forecasting System (Spreitzer et al.2019; Attinger et al.2019) would enable a detailed and systematic analysis of the processes that govern the destruction of negative PV. It would also potentially shed more light on the approximate lifetime and properties of the negative PV in the upper-level ridge. In addition, idealized high-resolution simulations might provide new insights into the integral life cycle of negative PV.

6 Conclusions
Back to toptop

We analyzed the influence of embedded convection in the WCB of Cyclone Vladiana in the North Atlantic in September 2016 on precipitation, cloud structure, the local mesoscale dynamics, and larger-scale circulation features. For this, two categories of online WCB trajectories – very rapidly ascending “convective” WCB trajectories and more slowly ascending “slantwise” WCB trajectories – were identified in a convection-permitting COSMO simulation, and their impact was investigated in a composite analysis and, in more detail, for a representative example. As expected from previous studies, the slantwise WCB ascent influences the large-scale precipitation pattern and the hydrometeor and PV distributions in a wide region. The specific signatures of embedded convection are superimposed on these larger-scale patterns from the slantwise WCB ascent. Based on the composite analysis and the investigation of a representative example of embedded convection in the WCB we make the following conclusions.

Convective WCB ascent leads to substantially stronger surface precipitation during the ascent with, on average, more than twice the intensity compared to the slantwise WCB ascent (cf. Oertel et al.2019). The occurrence of embedded convection is therefore relevant for the mesoscale precipitation pattern in cyclones and for extreme surface precipitation associated with WCBs (Pfahl et al.2014). Moreover, the strong convective updrafts allow for graupel formation, which is absent in the slantwise WCB ascent. Likewise, convective WCB ascent leads to a denser cloud structure in the convective updraft that is embedded within a larger-scale, less dense cloud band (Sect. 1, question 1).

The convective WCB trajectories originate from a region with higher θe and increased potential instability (dθe∕dz) at approximately 900 hPa compared to their environment, which allows for the rapid quasi-vertical convective ascent through the whole troposphere. Although convective WCB ascent is embedded within the larger-scale region of slantwise WCB ascent, mesoscale θe variability and strong localized θe gradients in the warm sector give rise to the higher initial θe of the convective WCB trajectories compared to the slantwise WCB trajectories, which subsequently leads to more intense cloud diabatic processes and stronger cross-isentropic ascent (Sect. 1, questions 2 and 3).

The strong horizontal diabatic heating gradients associated with the localized convective WCB ascent result in the formation of middle- to upper-level horizontal PV dipoles on both sides of the convective updraft, where the negative pole (with a diameter of approximately 30 km) occurs to the left of the vertical wind shear vector (cf. Harvey et al.2020), i.e., relatively close to the upper-level jet (Sect. 1, question 4). The level of maximum amplitude of the PV dipole at around 315–320 K coincides approximately with the diabatic heating maximum associated with the maximum of snow and graupel formation. These convectively produced PV dipoles are predominantly anomalies of absolute vertical vorticity. Static stability inside the convective updraft and across both poles is slightly increased compared to the environment due to strong latent heat release in the updraft. Above the updraft, at about 10 km height, a shallow region of low static stability located inside a cirrus cloud spreads out horizontally.

The low-level and upper-level mesoscale PV features of the convective WCB trajectories are associated with a coherent circulation anomaly, indicating that PV invertibility is qualitatively also valid at this scale. The positive low-level PV monopole below the convective updraft center induces a cyclonic wind anomaly, resulting in a local increase in the low-level wind velocity to the right of the vertical wind shear vector and a decrease to the left. The upper-level PV dipole is associated with cyclonic and anticyclonic circulation anomalies around the positive and negative poles, respectively (Sect. 1, question 5). The superposition of the circulation anomalies induced by these PV anomalies decelerates the flow near the convective updraft and potentially stabilizes the convectively generated PV dipole against the background flow (see Oertel2020, chap. 7).

On the larger scale, the individual mesoscale PV dipoles can, in certain synoptic situations as in this case, aggregate to elongated PV dipole bands downstream of the convective updraft region, which are associated with coherent larger-scale circulation anomalies. The negative PV pole is characterized by a relatively long lifetime of several hours. During its lifetime it is advected close to the upper-level waveguide, where it strengthens the isentropic PV gradient. Its anticyclonic circulation anomaly can contribute to the formation of a jet streak more than 1300 km downstream of the convective updraft and the initial formation of the PV dipole. This suggests that the mesoscale PV anomalies produced by embedded convection upstream can interact with the synoptic-scale circulation and the upper-level jet and potentially influence the downstream flow evolution; thus, they are dynamically relevant (Sect. 1, question 6).

Finally, our mesoscale view on the WCB reveals its heterogeneity. The distinction between slantwise and convective WCB trajectories emphasizes the significantly different impacts on the cloud and precipitation structure and the local mesoscale and larger-scale dynamics, whereby the convective WCB trajectories are accountable for distinct properties, such as the formation of graupel and an upper-level PV dipole, which are absent for purely slantwise-ascending WCB trajectories.

Data availability
Back to toptop
Data availability. 

All data are available from the authors upon request.

Video supplement
Back to toptop
Video supplement. 

Supplemental information related to this paper is available from the ETH research collection at https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000392157.

Author contributions
Back to toptop
Author contributions. 

AO performed the simulation and the data analysis and prepared a first version of the paper. All authors continuously discussed the results and contributed to the final paper.

Competing interests
Back to toptop
Competing interests. 

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
Back to toptop
Acknowledgements. 

The COSMO simulations were performed at the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS), as part of the project sm08 (2017–2019). We appreciate the data from EUMETSAT for the visualization of the WCB cloud band and would like to thank Annette K. Miltenberger for her support with the COSMO online trajectory module. Finally, we greatly appreciate the constructive and detailed feedback by Florian Pantillon and Jeffrey Chagnon, which helped to further improve the quality of this article.

Financial support
Back to toptop
Financial support. 

This research has been supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 165941).

Review statement
Back to toptop
Review statement. 

This paper was edited by Gwendal Rivière and reviewed by Jeffrey Chagnon and Florian Pantillon.

References
Back to toptop

Agustì-Panareda, A., Gray, S. L., and Methven, J.: Numerical modeling study of boundary-layer ventilation by a cold front over Europe, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D18304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005555, 2005. a

Anthes, R. A., Kuo, Y.-H., and Gyakum, J. R.: Numerical simulations of a case of explosive marine cyclogenesis, Mon. Weather Rev., 111, 1174–1188, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111<1174:NSOACO>2.0.CO;2, 1983. a

Attinger, R., Spreitzer, E., Boettcher, M., Forbes, R., Wernli, H., and Joos, H.: Quantifying the role of individual diabatic processes for the formation of PV anomalies in a North Pacific cyclone, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 2454–2476, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3573, 2019. a

Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., and Reinhardt, T.: Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the COSMO model: Description and sensitivities, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3887–3905, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1, 2011. a, b, c

Ban, N., Schmidli, J., and Schär, C.: Evaluation of the convection-resolving regional climate modeling approach in decade-long simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 7889–7907, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021478, 2014. a

Baumgart, M., Ghinassi, P., Wirth, V., Selz, T., Craig, G. C., and Riemer, M.: Quantitative view on the processes governing the upscale error growth up to the planetary scale using a stochastic convection scheme, Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 1713–1731, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0292.1, 2019. a

Bennetts, D. A. and Hoskins, B. J.: Conditional symmetric instability – a possible explanation for frontal rainbands, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 105, 945–962, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710544615, 1979. a

Berman, J. D. and Torn, R. D.: The impact of initial condition and warm conveyor belt forecast uncertainty on variability in the downstream waveguide in an ECWMF case Study, Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 4071–4089, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0333.1, 2019. a

Binder, H.: Warm conveyor belts: cloud structure and role for cyclone dynamics and extreme events, PhD thesis No. 24016, ETH Zürich, Zurich, available at: https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/164982 (last access: October 2019), 2016. a

Binder, H., Boettcher, M., Joos, H., and Wernli, H.: The role of warm conveyor belts for the intensification of extratropical cyclones in Northern Hemisphere winter, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 3997–4020, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0302.1, 2016. a, b

Birkett, H. R. and Thorpe, A. J.: Superposing semi-geostrophic potential-vorticity anomalies, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 2157–2163, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354318, 1997. a, b

Bishop, C. H. and Thorpe, A. J.: Potential vorticity and the electrostatics analogy: Quasi-geostrophic theory, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 120, 713–731, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712051710, 1994. a, b

Bony, S., Stevens, B., Frierson, D. M. W., Jakob, C., Kageyama, M., Pincus, R., Shepherd, T. G., Sherwood, S. C., Siebesma, A. P., Sobel, A. H., Watanabe, M., and Webb, M. J.: Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity, Nat. Geosci., 8, 261–268, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2398, 2015. a

Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and aerosols, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 571–657, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016, 2013. a

Browning, K.: Conceptual models of precipitation systems, Weather Forecast., 1, 23–41, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1986)001<0023:CMOPS>2.0.CO;2, 1986. a, b, c

Browning, K.: Mesoscale aspects of extratropical cyclones: An observational perspective, in: The life cycles of extratropical cyclones, edited by: Shapiro, M. A. and Grønås, S., Amer. Meteorol. Soc., Boston, MA, 265–283, 1999. a

Caldwell, P. M., Zelinka, M. D., Taylor, K. E., and Marvel, K.: Quantifying the sources of intermodel spread in equilibrium climate sensitivity, J. Climate, 29, 513–524, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0352.1, 2016. a

Cao, Z. and Cho, H.-R.: Generation of moist potential vorticity in extratropical cyclones, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3263–3282, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3263:GOMPVI>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a

Chagnon, J. M. and Gray, S. L.: Horizontal potential vorticity dipoles on the convective storm scale, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 135, 1392–1408, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.468, 2009. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j

Chagnon, J. M. and Gray, S. L.: A diabatically generated potential vorticity structure near the extratropical tropopause in three simulated extratropical cyclones, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 2337–2347, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00092.1, 2015. a

Chagnon, J. M., Gray, S. L., and Methven, J.: Diabatic processes modifying potential vorticity in a North Atlantic cyclone, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 139, 1270–1282, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2037, 2013. a, b, c, d

Clark, P. A., Browning, K. A., and Wang, C.: The sting at the end of the tail: Model diagnostics of fine-scale three-dimensional structure of the cloud head, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 2263–2292, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.36, 2005. a

Clarke, S. J., Gray, S. L., and Roberts, N. M.: Downstream influence of mesoscale convective systems: Part 1: influence on forecast evolution, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 2933–2952, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3593, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g

Conzemius, R. J. and Montgomery, M. T.: Clarification on the generation of absolute and potential vorticity in mesoscale convective vortices, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7591–7605, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7591-2009, 2009. a

Crespo, J. A. and Posselt, D. J.: A-Train-based case study of stratiform – convective transition within a warm conveyor belt, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 2069–2084, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0435.1, 2016. a

Davies, H. and Didone, M.: Diagnosis and dynamics of forecast error growth, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 2483–2501, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00242.1, 2013. a

Davis, C. A. and Weisman, M. L.: Balanced dynamics of mesoscale vortices produced in simulated convective systems, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2005–2030, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2005:BDOMVP>2.0.CO;2, 1994. a

Doms, G. and Baldauf, M.: A description of the non-hydrostatic regional COSMO model. Part I: Dynamics and numerics, Report COSMO-Model 5.5, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany, available at: http://www2.cosmo-model.org/content/model/documentation/core/cosmoDyncsNumcs.pdf (last access: October 2019), 2018. a

Done, J. M., Craig, G. C., Gray, S. L., Clark, P. A., and Gray, M. E. B.: Mesoscale simulations of organized convection: Importance of convective equilibrium, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 737–756, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.84, 2006. a

Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Wernli, H., James, P., Forster, C., and Spichtinger, N.: A 15-year climatology of warm conveyor belts, J. Climate, 17, 218–237, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0218:AYCOWC>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a, b

Ertel, H.: Ein neuer hydrodynamischer Wirbelsatz, Meteorol. Z., 59, 277–281, 1942. a

Flaounas, E., Lagouvardos, K., Kotroni, V., Claud, C., Delanoe, J., Flamant, C., Madonna, E., and Wernli, H.: Processes leading to heavy precipitation associated with two Mediterranean cyclones observed during the HyMeX SOP1, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 275–286, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2618, 2016. a

Flaounas, E., Kotroni, V., Lagouvardos, K., Gray, S. L., Rysman, J.-F., and Claud, C.: Heavy rainfall in Mediterranean cyclones. Part 1: contribution of deep convection and warm conveyor belt, Clim. Dynam., 50, 2935–2949, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3783-x, 2018. a, b

Grams, C. M., Wernli, H., Boettcher, M., Čampa, J., Corsmeier, U., Jones, S. C., Keller, J. H., Lenz, C.-J., and Wiegand, L.: The key role of diabatic processes in modifying the upper-tropospheric wave guide: a North Atlantic case-study, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 2174–2193, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.891, 2011. a, b, c, d

Grams, C. M., Magnusson, L., and Madonna, E.: An atmospheric dynamics perspective on the amplification and propagation of forecast error in numerical weather prediction models: A case study, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 144, 2577–2591, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3353, 2018. a

Harrold, T. W.: Mechanisms influencing the distribution of precipitation within baroclinic disturbances, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 232–251, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709942003, 1973. a

Harvey, B., Methven, J., Sanchez, C., and Schäfler, A.: Diabatic generation of negative potential vorticity and its impact on the North Atlantic jet stream, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3747, in press, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h

Harvey, B. J., Methven, J., and Ambaum, M. H. P.: Rossby wave propagation on potential vorticity fronts with finite width, J. Fluid Mech., 794, 775–797, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.180, 2016. a

Hitchman, M. H. and Rowe, S. M.: On the similarity of lower-stratospheric potential vorticity dipoles above tropical and midlatitude deep convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2593–2613, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0239.1, 2017. a, b, c

Hoskins, B.: Potential vorticity and the PV perspective, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 32, 2–9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-0007-8, 2015. a, b, c

Hoskins, B. J., McIntyre, M. E., and Robertson, A. W.: On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 111, 877–946, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711147002, 1985. a, b, c, d

Joos, H.: Warm conveyor belts and their role for cloud radiative forcing in the extratropical storm tracks, J. Climate, 32, 5325–5343, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0802.1, 2019. a, b

Joos, H. and Forbes, R. M.: Impact of different IFS microphysics on a warm conveyor belt and the downstream flow evolution, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 2727–2739, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2863, 2016. a, b

Joos, H. and Wernli, H.: Influence of microphysical processes on the potential vorticity development in a warm conveyor belt: a case-study with the limited-area model COSMO, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 138, 407–418, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.934, 2012. a, b, c, d, e

Joos, H., Spichtinger, P., Reutter, P., and Fusina, F.: Influence of heterogeneous freezing on the microphysical and radiative properties of orographic cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6835–6852, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6835-2014, 2014. a

Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016, 2016. a, b

Kuo, Y.-H., Shapiro, M. A., and Donall, E. G.: The interaction between baroclinic and diabatic processes in a numerical simulation of a rapidly intensifying extratropical marine cyclone, Mon. Weather Rev., 119, 368–384, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<0368:TIBBAD>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a

Luebke, A. E., Afchine, A., Costa, A., Grooß, J.-U., Meyer, J., Rolf, C., Spelten, N., Avallone, L. M., Baumgardner, D., and Krämer, M.: The origin of midlatitude ice clouds and the resulting influence on their microphysical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5793–5809, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5793-2016, 2016. a, b

Madonna, E., Wernli, H., Joos, H., and Martius, O.: Warm conveyor belts in the ERA-Interim dataset (1979–2010). Part I: Climatology and potential vorticity evolution, J. Climate, 27, 3–26, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00720.1, 2014. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i

Martínez-Alvarado, O. and Plant, R. S.: Parametrized diabatic processes in numerical simulations of an extratropical cyclone, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 140, 1742–1755, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2254, 2014. a

Martínez-Alvarado, O., Joos, H., Chagnon, J., Boettcher, M., Gray, S. L., Plant, R. S., Methven, J., and Wernli, H.: The dichotomous structure of the warm conveyor belt, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 140, 1809–1824, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2276, 2014. a, b

Martínez-Alvarado, O., Gray, S. L., and Methven, J.: Diabatic processes and the evolution of two contrasting summer extratropical cyclones, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 3251–3276, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0395.1, 2016a. a

Martínez-Alvarado, O., Madonna, E., Gray, S. L., and Joos, H.: A route to systematic error in forecasts of Rossby waves, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 196–210, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2645, 2016b. a

Miltenberger, A. K., Pfahl, S., and Wernli, H.: An online trajectory module (version 1.0) for the nonhydrostatic numerical weather prediction model COSMO, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1989–2004, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1989-2013, 2013. a

Miltenberger, A. K., Roches, A., Pfahl, S., and Wernli, H.: Online trajectory module in COSMO: A short user guide, COSMO Technical Report 24, available at: http://www.cosmo-model.org/content/model/documentation/techReports/default.htm (last access: March 2020), 2014. a

Neiman, P. J., Shapiro, M. A., and Fedor, L. S.: The life cycle of an extratropical marine cyclone. Part II: Mesoscale structure and diagnostics, Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 2177–2199, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<2177:TLCOAE>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a

Oertel, A.: Embedded convection in warm conveyor belts, PhD thesis No. 26554, ETH Zürich, Zurich, 2020. a, b, c, d, e

Oertel, A., Boettcher, M., Joos, H., Sprenger, M., Konow, H., Hagen, M., and Wernli, H.: Convective activity in an extratropical cyclone and its warm conveyor belt – a case-study combining observations and a convection-permitting model simulation, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 1406–1426, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3500, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o

Pfahl, S., Madonna, E., Boettcher, M., Joos, H., and Wernli, H.: Warm conveyor belts in the ERA-Interim data set (1979–2010). Part II: Moisture origin and relevance for precipitation, J. Climate, 27, 27–40, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00223.1, 2014. a, b

Pomroy, H. R. and Thorpe, A. J.: The evolution and dynamical role of reduced upper-tropospheric potential vorticity in intensive observing period one of FASTEX, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 1817–1834, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1817:TEADRO>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a, b, c, d, e

Rasp, S., Selz, T., and Craig, G.: Convective and slantwise trajectory ascent in convection-permitting simulations of midlatitude cyclones, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 3961–3976, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0112.1, 2016. a, b, c

Raymond, D. J. and Jiang, H.: A theory for long-lived mesoscale convective systems, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 3067–3077, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<3067:ATFLLM>2.0.CO;2, 1990. a

Rodwell, M. J., Magnusson, L., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Bonavita, M., Cardinali, C., Diamantakis, M., Earnshaw, P., Garcia-Mendez, A., Isaksen, L., Källén, E., Klocke, D., Lopez, P., McNally, T., Persson, A., Prates, F., and Wedi, N.: Characteristics of occasional poor medium-range weather forecasts for Europe, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1393–1405, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00099.1, 2013. a

Rossa, A., Wernli, H., and Davies, H. C.: Growth and decay of an extra-tropical cyclone's PV-tower, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 73, 139–156, https://doi.org/10.1007/s007030050070, 2000. a, b

Rowe, S. M. and Hitchman, M. H.: On the role of inertial instability in stratosphere – troposphere exchange near midlatitude cyclones, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 2131–2151, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0210.1, 2015. a

Rowe, S. M. and Hitchman, M. H.: On the relationship between inertial instability, poleward momentum surges, and jet intensifications near midlatitude cyclones, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 2299–2315, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0183.1, 2016. a, b

Schäfler, A. and Harnisch, F.: Impact of the inflow moisture on the evolution of a warm conveyor belt, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 299–310, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2360, 2015. a

Schäler, A., Craig, C., Wernli, H., Arbogast, P., Doyle, J. D., McTaggart-Cowan, R., Methven, J., Rivière, G., Ament, F., Boettcher, M., Bramberger, M., Cazenave, Q., Cotton, R., Crewell, S., Delanoë, J., Dörnbrack, A., Ehrlich, A., Ewald, F., Fix, A., Grams, C. M., Gray, S. L., Grob, H., Groß, S., Hagen, M., Harvey, B., Hirsch, L., Jacob, M., Kölling, T., Konow, H., Lemmerz, C., Lux, O., Magnusson, L., Mayer, B., Mech, M., Moore, R., Pelon, J., Quinting, J., Rahm, S., Rapp, M., Rautenhaus, M., Reitebuch, O., Reynolds, C. A., Sodemann, H., Spengler, T., Vaughan, G., Wendisch, M., Wirth, M., Witschas, B., Wolf, K., and Zinner, T.: The North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 1607–1637, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0003.1, 2018. a

Schemm, S.: Conveyor belts in idealized moist baroclinic wave life cycles, PhD thesis No.20940, ETH Zürich, Zurich, https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-7632512, 2013. a

Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkmann, J., Rota, S., and Ratier, A.: An introduction to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 977–992, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0977:AITMSG>2.3.CO;2, 2002. a

Schultz, D. M. and Schumacher, P. N.: The use and misuse of conditional symmetric instability, Mon. Weather Rev., 127, 2709–2732, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<2709:TUAMOC>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a, b, c, d

Schultz, D. M., Schumacher, P. N., and Doswell, C. A.: The intricacies of instabilities, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 4143–4148, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)129<4143:TIOI>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a

Selz, T. and Craig, G.: Upscale error growth in a high-resolution simulation of a summertime weather event over Europe, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 813–827, 2015. a

Sherwood, S. C.: On moist instability, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 4139–4142, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)129<4139:OMI>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a

Shutts, G.: Idealized numerical simulations of mesoscale convective systems and their implications for forecast error, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 143, 1608–1619, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3031, 2017. a, b, c

Siedersleben, S. K. and Gohm, A.: The missing link between terrain-induced potential vorticity banners and banded convection, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 4063–4080, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0042.1, 2016. a

Spreitzer, E., Attinger, R., Boettcher, M., Forbes, R., Wernli, H., and Joos, H.: Modification of potential vorticity near the tropopause by nonconservative processes in the ECMWF model, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1709–1726, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0295.1, 2019. a

Stoelinga, M. T.: A potential vorticity-based study of the role of diabatic heating and friction in a numerically simulated baroclinic cyclone, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 849–874, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<0849:APVBSO>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a, b, c

Thompson, C. F., Schultz, D. M., and Vaughan, G.: A global climatology of tropospheric inertial instability, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 805–825, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0062.1, 2018. a, b, c

Thorpe, A. J. and Bishop, C. H.: Potential vorticity and the electrostatics analogy: Ertel–Rossby formulation, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 121, 1477–1495, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152612, 1995. a

Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779–1800, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2, 1989. a

Vial, J., Dufresne, J.-L., and Bony, S.: On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates, Clim. Dynam., 41, 3339–3362, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1725-9, 2013. a

Volonté, A., Clark, P. A., and Gray, S. L.: The role of mesoscale instabilities in the sting-jet dynamics of windstorm Tini, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 144, 877–899, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3264, 2018. a

Volonté, A., Clark, P. A., and Gray, S. L.: Idealised simulations of cyclones with robust symmetrically unstable sting jets, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 63–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-63-2020, 2020. a

Weijenborg, C., Friederichs, P., and Hense, A.: Organisation of potential vorticity on the mesoscale during deep moist convection, Tellus, 67, 25705, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v67.25705, 2015. a, b, c, d, e

Weijenborg, C., Chagnon, J. M., Friederichs, P., Gray, S. L., and Hense, A.: Coherent evolution of potential vorticity anomalies associated with deep moist convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 143, 1254–1267, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3000, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f

Wernli, H.: A Lagrangian-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. II: A detailed case-study, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 1677–1706, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354211, 1997.  a, b

Wernli, H. and Davies, H. C.: A Lagrangian-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. I: The method and some applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 467–489, https://doi.org/10.1256/smsqj.53810, 1997. a, b, c, d, e, f

Wernli, H., Dirren, S., Liniger, M. A., and Zillig, M.: Dynamical aspects of the life cycle of the winter storm `Lothar' (24–26 December 1999), Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 128, 405–429, https://doi.org/10.1256/003590002321042036, 2002. a

Wernli, H., Boettcher, M., Joos, H., Miltenberger, A. K., and Spichtinger, P.: A trajectory-based classification of ERA-Interim ice clouds in the region of the North Atlantic storm track, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 6657–6664, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068922, 2016. a

Zhang, Y., Macke, A., and Albers, F.: Effect of crystal size spectrum and crystal shape on stratiform cirrus radiative forcing, Atmos. Res., 52, 59–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(99)00026-5, 1999. a

1

Note that the nonconservation of θe leads to the nonconservation of the equivalent potential vorticity (EPV) along the ascent, which is often considered to be conserved (e.g., Hitchman and Rowe2017) for saturated convective motion (neglecting PV modification through the solenoid effect; for details see Cao and Cho1995). EPV is defined as PV but with θe replacing θ (EPV=1ρωθe).

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Warm conveyor belts (WCBs) are important, mainly stratiform cloud forming airstreams in extratropical cyclones that can include embedded convection. This WCB case study systematically compares the characteristics of convective vs. slantwise ascent of the WCB. We find that embedded convection leads to regions of significantly stronger precipitation. Moreover, it strongly modifies the potential vorticity distribution in the lower and upper troposphere, where its also influences the waveguide.
Warm conveyor belts (WCBs) are important, mainly stratiform cloud forming airstreams in...
Citation